Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Mimirs402/bountyverdict --skill audit-agent-harnessgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mimirs402/bountyverdictWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mimirs402/bountyverdict/audit-agent-harness)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mimirs402/bountyverdict/audit-agent-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mimirs402/bountyverdict/audit-agent-harness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mimirs402/bountyverdict/audit-agent-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mimirs402/bountyverdict/audit-agent-harness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00664 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00332 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
audit-agent-harness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- audit-agent-harness — 91% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 52 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Audit Agent Harness
Use HarnessVerdict as a deterministic repository preflight. Treat the result as structural evidence, not proof that a model will obey every instruction.
Resolve and inspect the service
- Read
https://mimirs402.github.io/bountyverdict/agent-manifest.json. - Require
status: activeand a credential-free HTTPSproduction_apiorigin. - Inspect
<production_api>/api/harness/sampleand<production_api>/openapi.jsonbefore purchasing. - Canonicalize the target to
https://github.com/owner/repository. Audit public repositories only.
Verify before paying
Make an unpaid request first:
POST <production_api>/api/repository-agent-instructions-audit
Content-Type: application/json
{"repo_url":"<CANONICAL_GITHUB_REPOSITORY_URL>"}
Require all of these from the x402 challenge:
- HTTP
402, x402 v2, exact scheme; - service name
HarnessVerdict; - Base mainnet
eip155:8453; - canonical Base USDC
0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913; - amount no greater than
30000atomic units; - Bazaar method
POST, JSON body input, and a strictrepo_urlfield matching the intended repository.
Bind the payment client to the expected network, asset, recipient, and 30,000-atomic cap. Reject any changed challenge. Never reveal wallet secrets, seed phrases, API keys, or payment signatures.
Standard x402 authorizes the resource URL, not the POST body. Verify the advisory normalized-body SHA-256, preserve the exact validated JSON body on the signed retry, and reject any body change. After a transport timeout, reconcile wallet activity before retrying so one audit is not paid twice.
Use the result
REPAIR: stop autonomous work until critical safety or instruction-discovery gaps are fixed.REVIEW: inspect every cited finding and repair material path, scope, portability, or context-budget risks.READY: continue only after reading the reported instruction files and repository-specific constraints.
Require repository.commit_sha; it identifies the exact audited snapshot. Follow each evidence_url, apply recommendations, and inspect coverage for tree or file-selection truncation. Never interpret an absent finding beyond the disclosed coverage and limitations.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 52 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 3cde241e5fc2
audit-agent-harness is a skill published in the GitHub repository Mimirs402/bountyverdict (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 664 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
bellwether
Bring the current PR to a mergeable state: CI green, all review comments resolved, no merge conflicts. Self-contained — watches CI, fixes issues, watches again until merge-ready. Use when the user wants to keep a PR green, auto-fix CI, resolve review comments, or says "get this merged".
GitHub Actions CI Patterns
Use this skill when adding or debugging GitHub Actions workflows and you want repeatable CI behavior, minimal permissions, and clear failure logs.
aw-author
Author, validate, and improve GitHub Agentic Workflow (gh-aw) markdown files. Use when the user wants to create a new workflow, validate an existing workflow, improve a workflow, or debug workflow issues. Triggers on: "aw-author", "agentic workflow", "gh-aw workflow", "workflow markdown", "workflow frontmatter"…
aw-daily
Fully autonomous daily pipeline for the aw-author plugin. Executes intelligence research (web search + GitHub activity queries), posts to Discussions, performs gap analysis against reference files, creates issues, implements changes on develop branch, creates PR, requests review, and auto-merges. Designed for…
gh-aw-report
Daily intelligence reporting for the GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) ecosystem. Executes 8+ targeted web searches, synthesizes findings into a structured Markdown report, updates the persistent knowledge base, and optionally posts to GitHub Discussions. Triggers on: "aw-report", "gh-aw report", "intelligence sweep"…
ai-debt-audit
Scan a repository for AI-generated technical, cognitive, and intent debt. Use when the user asks to audit a codebase for AI/vibe-coding risk, check for issues an AI coding assistant may have introduced (disabled RLS, hardcoded secrets, missing auth checks, SSTI, debug mode left on), assess technical debt after heavy…