Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-Atlas --skill engagement-lifecyclegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-AtlasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/engagement-lifecycle)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/engagement-lifecycle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/engagement-lifecycle/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/engagement-lifecycle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/engagement-lifecycle.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.01267 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00633 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00253 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
engagement-lifecycle scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to engagement-lifecycle — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Engagement Lifecycle Management
Engagement Initiation
Pre-Flight Checklist
Before starting any engagement, verify:
-
Documents exist and are valid:
-
roe.json— Rules of Engagement with scope, restrictions, contacts -
conops.json— Concept of Operations with threat profile and kill chain phases -
deconfliction.json— Deconfliction identifiers and procedures -
opplan.json— Operational Plan with sequenced, acceptance-gated objectives - All documents cross-reference consistently
-
-
Infrastructure ready:
- Docker sandbox running with required tools
- C2 server reachable if post-exploitation is in scope:
nc -z c2-sliver 31337(gRPC port) - Operator config exists:
/workspace/.sliver-configs/atlas.cfg - Output directories created (
<engagement>/recon/,<engagement>/exploit/, etc.)
-
If any document is missing: Delegate to
soundwavesub-agent first.
All paths below are relative to the engagement working directory (set via cd before commands run).
Engagement Types and Implications
| Type | Starting Phase | Sub-Agents Used | Key Consideration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Scope | Planning → Recon | All (soundwave, recon, exploit, postexploit) | Longest duration, most OPSEC-sensitive |
| Assumed Breach | Exploitation | exploit, postexploit | Skip recon, start from provided foothold |
| Recon Only | Recon | recon only | No exploitation, intelligence gathering only |
| Objective-Based | Varies | Targeted subset | Focus on specific crown jewels |
Read roe.json to determine engagement type and adjust phase ordering accordingly.
Phase Transitions
Gate Checks (Go/No-Go Decisions)
Before transitioning between phases, verify the gate criteria from the workflow skill:
Planning → Recon: roe.json + conops.json + deconfliction.json + opplan.json exist and validated
Recon → Exploit: Attack surface identified, targets prioritized, vulns catalogued
Exploit → PostExploit: Initial foothold established, access type documented
PostExploit → Report: All OPPLAN objectives resolved (passed or blocked)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 130 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 8e4e588a2f80
engagement-lifecycle is a skill published in the GitHub repository MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-Atlas (11 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,267 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to engagement-lifecycle, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
cis-aws-foundations-6.5
Ensure the default security group of every VPC restricts all traffic.
cis-aws-foundations-4.3
Ensure AWS Config is enabled in all regions.
cis-aws-foundations-2.1.3
Ensure Organizations management account is not used for workloads.
cis-aws-foundations-2.5
Ensure MFA is enabled for the 'root' user account.
cis-aws-foundations-2.7
Eliminate use of the 'root' user for administrative and daily tasks.
cis-aws-foundations-4.4
Ensure that server access logging is enabled on the CloudTrail S3 bucket.