Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/minhthang1009/dotclaude/modernize-mapnpx skills add MinhThang1009/dotclaude --skill modernize-mapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MinhThang1009/dotclaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/minhthang1009/dotclaude/modernize-map)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/minhthang1009/dotclaude/modernize-map"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/minhthang1009/dotclaude/modernize-map.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01236 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00618 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00247 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
modernize-map scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Build a dependency and topology map of legacy/$1 and render it visually.
The assessment gave us domains. Now go one level deeper: how do the pieces connect? This is the map an engineer needs before touching anything.
What to produce
Write a one-off analysis script (Python or shell — your choice) that parses
the source under legacy/$1 and extracts the four datasets below. Three
principles apply across stacks; getting them wrong produces a misleading map:
- Edges live in two places — direct calls in source, and dispatcher/ router calls whose targets are variables (config tables, route maps, dependency injection, dynamic dispatch). Resolve variables against config before declaring an edge unresolvable.
- The code↔storage join is usually external configuration, not source — job/deployment descriptors map logical names to physical stores.
- Entry points usually live in deployment config, not source — without parsing it, every top-level module looks unreachable.
Extract:
- Program/module call graph — direct calls (
CALL, method invocations,import/require) and dispatcher calls (EXEC CICS LINK/XCTL, DI container wiring, framework routing, reflection/factory). Resolve variable call targets against route tables, copybooks, config, or constant pools. - Data dependency graph — which modules read/write which data stores,
joined through the relevant config:
SELECT…ASSIGN TO↔ JCLDD(batch COBOL),EXEC CICS READ/WRITE…FILE()↔ CSDDEFINE FILE(CICS online),EXEC SQLtable refs (embedded SQL), ORM annotations/mappings (Java/.NET), model files (Node/Python/Ruby). Include UI/screen bindings (BMS maps, JSPs, templates) — they're dependencies too. - Entry points — whatever the stack's outermost invoker is, read from
where it's defined: JCL
EXEC PGM=and CICS CSDDEFINE TRANSACTION(mainframe),web.xml/route annotations/route files (web),main()/argv parsing (CLI), queue/scheduler subscriptions (event-driven). - Dead-end candidates — modules with no inbound edges. Only meaningful once all the entry-point and call-edge types above are in the graph. Suppress the dead claim for anything that could be the target of an unresolved dynamic call. A grep-only graph will mark most dispatcher-driven modules (CICS programs, Spring controllers, ORM-bound DAOs) dead when they aren't.
If the source is fixed-column (COBOL columns 8–72, RPG, etc.), slice the code area and strip comment lines before regex matching, or you'll match sequence numbers and commented-out code.
Save the script as analysis/$1/extract_topology.py (or .sh) so it can be
re-run and audited. Have it write a machine-readable
analysis/$1/topology.json and print a human summary. Run it; show the
summary (cap at ~200 lines for very large estates).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 106 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A a9656709cc18
modernize-map is a skill published in the GitHub repository MinhThang1009/dotclaude (20 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,236 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
event-store-design
Design and implement event stores for event-sourced systems. Use when building event sourcing infrastructure, choosing event store technologies, or implementing event persistence patterns.
convex-explain-app
Explain an existing Convex app — data model + relationships, public vs internal functions, auth/ownership model, components, a request→data flow — read from the schema and function surface. Read-only.
platform-custom-field-generate
Use this skill when users need to create, generate, or validate Salesforce Custom Field metadata. Trigger when users mention custom fields, field types, Roll-up Summary fields, Master-Detail relationships, Lookup relationships, formula fields, picklists, dependent (controlling) picklists, referencing a value set from…
openloomi-api
OpenLoomi ships a local-first HTTP API served from the desktop app (port 3414, fallback 3515). All auth, Memory, AI, RAG, Loop, and Audit data live in a local SQLite database — your data stays on your machine and the OpenLoomi app is the source of truth. The only externally-routed auth path is the Composio OAuth…
nornicdb-grpc
Drive NornicDB over gRPC — the Qdrant-compatible surface (Collections, Points, Snapshots) plus the additive NornicSearch service. Use when ingesting via Qdrant SDKs, migrating from Qdrant, or running hybrid text+vector search from a non-Bolt client. Covers connection, RPC catalog, collection→database mapping…
field-service-sobject-create-configure
Headless 360 REST API deployment step for creating sObject records. Handles describe-based field discovery, required-field derivation, entity-relationship ordering, and composite graph transactions. Use this skill when a designer skill (or a user directly) needs to create sObject records after design confirmation…