Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/minihellboy/factorminer/factor-backtestnpx skills add minihellboy/factorminer --skill factor-backtestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/minihellboy/factorminerWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00088 | $0.00578 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00289 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
factor-backtest scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Factor Backtest
A library of individually-decent factors is not a strategy. This skill combines them into one composite signal and backtests the portfolio that signal implies — the level at which transaction costs and capacity actually bite.
Workflow
1. Combine and backtest
factorminer combine output/run1/factor_library.json \
--data path/to/market_data.csv \
--method all --fit-period train --eval-period test
--method—equal-weight,ic-weighted,orthogonal, orallto compare every method.--fit-period— split used to fit weights / run selection (usetrain).--eval-period— split used to score the composite (usetest).--selection— optional pre-filter:lasso,stepwise,xgboost, ornone.--top-k— keep only the top-K factors before combining.
The report gives composite IC Mean, ICIR, Long-Short return, Monotonicity, and Avg Turnover.
2. Generate tearsheets
For the visual portfolio view — quintile returns, IC time series, correlation heatmap:
factorminer -o output/run1 visualize output/run1/factor_library.json \
--data market_data.csv --period test --tearsheet --quintile --correlation
What to look for
- Monotonicity — quintile returns should step up Q1→Q5. A non-monotone composite is fragile regardless of headline IC.
- Long-short return net of turnover — high
Avg Turnovermeans the gross return is optimistic; FactorMiner's transaction-cost model is what makes the net number honest. - Method spread — if
orthogonalandequal-weightdisagree sharply, the library has redundant or unstable factors; revisitfactor-evaluation.
Guardrails
- Fit weights on
train, score ontest— never fit and score on the same split. - The backtest estimates historical behavior; it is not a forward return promise. Present it as a research artifact for review.
- Report net-of-cost numbers as the headline; gross numbers only as context.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 48 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 0a555823d0b7
factor-backtest is a skill published in the GitHub repository minihellboy/factorminer (105 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 578 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…