Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add minihellboy/factorminer --skill factor-backtestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/minihellboy/factorminerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/minihellboy/factorminer/factor-backtest)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/minihellboy/factorminer/factor-backtest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/minihellboy/factorminer/factor-backtest/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/minihellboy/factorminer/factor-backtest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/minihellboy/factorminer/factor-backtest.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.00578 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00231 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
factor-backtest scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Factor Backtest
A library of individually-decent factors is not a strategy. This skill combines them into one composite signal and backtests the portfolio that signal implies — the level at which transaction costs and capacity actually bite.
Workflow
1. Combine and backtest
factorminer combine output/run1/factor_library.json \
--data path/to/market_data.csv \
--method all --fit-period train --eval-period test
--method—equal-weight,ic-weighted,orthogonal, orallto compare every method.--fit-period— split used to fit weights / run selection (usetrain).--eval-period— split used to score the composite (usetest).--selection— optional pre-filter:lasso,stepwise,xgboost, ornone.--top-k— keep only the top-K factors before combining.
The report gives composite IC Mean, ICIR, Long-Short return, Monotonicity, and Avg Turnover.
2. Generate tearsheets
For the visual portfolio view — quintile returns, IC time series, correlation heatmap:
factorminer -o output/run1 visualize output/run1/factor_library.json \
--data market_data.csv --period test --tearsheet --quintile --correlation
What to look for
- Monotonicity — quintile returns should step up Q1→Q5. A non-monotone composite is fragile regardless of headline IC.
- Long-short return net of turnover — high
Avg Turnovermeans the gross return is optimistic; FactorMiner's transaction-cost model is what makes the net number honest. - Method spread — if
orthogonalandequal-weightdisagree sharply, the library has redundant or unstable factors; revisitfactor-evaluation.
Guardrails
- Fit weights on
train, score ontest— never fit and score on the same split. - The backtest estimates historical behavior; it is not a forward return promise. Present it as a research artifact for review.
- Report net-of-cost numbers as the headline; gross numbers only as context.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 48 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 0a555823d0b7
factor-backtest is a skill published in the GitHub repository minihellboy/factorminer (123 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 578 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
sector-rotation
An analysis framework for comparing industries in the Chinese A-share stock market, using business conditions, price momentum, valuation, and money flows. It produces rankings and higher- or lower-allocation suggestions.
strategy-pivot-designer
Detect backtest iteration stagnation and generate structurally different strategy pivot proposals when parameter tuning reaches a local optimum.
twitter-reader
Read Twitter/X for financial research through opencli: the user's home timeline, tweet search, trending topics, bookmarks, a user's recent tweets, threads, articles, profiles, followers and following, and notifications. Use this skill whenever the user wants to know what people are saying on Twitter/X or fintwit about…
energy-procurement
Codified expertise for electricity and gas procurement, tariff optimization, demand charge management, renewable PPA evaluation, and multi-facility energy cost management. Informed by energy procurement managers with 15+ years experience at large commercial and industrial consumers. Includes market structure analysis…
airdrop-hunting-guide
Guide to finding and qualifying for crypto airdrops — eligibility criteria, farming strategies, on-chain activity requirements, Sybil detection avoidance, and tracking tools. Use when helping users understand airdrops, check eligibility, or plan participation strategies.
china-portfolio-monitoring
A monitoring framework for tracking the financial results, operating measures, strategic milestones, and risks of companies held by China-focused private-equity funds. It uses measures such as revenue growth, margins, debt, cash flow, and return on equity.