arsenal-tool-validation

arsenal-tool-validation is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Miosa-osa/OSA. It costs 142 tokens per session (1,259 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A validation and approval workflow for security-testing tools. It places tools into risk levels and keeps intrusive tools blocked until an approved person or allowlist permits them, with logged decisions and safe denial for unattended runs.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for classifying offensive tools, setting approval gates, controlling unattended runs, and recording tool-use decisions during authorised engagements.
Why use it?
It reduces the chance that a security exercise will damage systems or run a dangerous tool without approval.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It is for classifying offensive tools, setting approval gates, controlling unattended runs, and recording tool-use decisions during authorised engagements.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/miosa-osa/osa/arsenal-tool-validation
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Miosa-osa/OSA --skill arsenal-tool-validation
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Miosa-osa/OSA

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for arsenal-tool-validation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/arsenal-tool-validation/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/arsenal-tool-validation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/arsenal-tool-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/arsenal-tool-validation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for arsenal-tool-validation

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/arsenal-tool-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/arsenal-tool-validation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 142 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,259 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00142 $0.01259
Opus 5.5 $0.00057 $0.00504
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00028 $0.00252
Haiku 4.5 $0.00014 $0.00126

Measured 1mo ago against content hash c4811b3da9af, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

arsenal-tool-validation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

priv/skills/arsenal-tool-validation/SKILL.md · 111 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Arsenal — Tool Validation & Risk Gating

Derived from T3MP3ST's src/arsenal/ (Apache-2.0). The principle: an intrusive tool is INERT until a human has approved it — and the hottest actions fire a loud, audited warning every single time, even when approved.

1. Risk tiers

Tier Meaning Gated? Warning every use?
safe read-only probes, passive recon no no
active touches the target (scans, fuzzing) no (scope-gated) no
intrusive exploits, state-changing actions yes no
credential password attacks, credential stuffing yes yes
dangerous full post-ex frameworks, destructive ops yes yes

Undefined tier → treat as safe for gating but verify by inspection; a tool that mutates state must never sit in safe.

2. The approval gate

Two ways a gated tool becomes approved:

  1. Interactive: the first time the operator reaches for the tool, the system asks. A yes approves the TOOL (by name) for the rest of the session — "approve once, then free". Every use is still audited.
  2. Pre-authorized allowlist: for headless/unattended runs (benchmarks, automated hunts), the operator hands in an allowlist up front. Listed tools run free; anything off-list DENIES.

FAIL-SAFE rule: a gated tool that is neither pre-approved nor interactively approvable (no approver wired) is DENIED. An unattended run never silently fires an exploit because nobody was there to say no.

Spicy warnings: credential/dangerous tools fire a loud, audited, non-blocking WARNING on EVERY use even after approval — the operator should always SEE what the agent is about to do.

3. Egress scope — the always-on gate

Approval and scope are separate gates:

  • The egress scope gate refuses any action targeting an out-of-scope host, REGARDLESS of tool approval. Approval says "you may use this tool"; scope says "you may point it there". Both must pass.
  • Scope is a list written at engagement start (see penetration-testing); the gate checks targets against the list, not against the operator's claims.
  • An operator can extend gating to cover built-in probes too (T3MP3ST's GATE_BUILTINS pattern) — when in doubt, gate more, not less.

Read the full file on GitHub · 111 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 111 lines · 142 tokens per session scan A c4811b3da9af

Subscribe to this mod's changes

arsenal-tool-validation is a skill published in the GitHub repository Miosa-osa/OSA (78 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 142 tokens to every session and 1,259 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-14.