offensive-reporting

offensive-reporting is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Miosa-osa/OSA. It costs 200 tokens per session (3,955 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of offensive-reporting, Apache-2.0.

A method for writing penetration-test and red-team reports. It covers summaries for non-technical readers, detailed findings, reproduction steps, fixes, references, and CVSS severity scoring.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to document authorised security assessments, explain findings, assign justified severity scores, and describe remediation.
Why use it?
It gives security results a consistent structure so technical teams can reproduce and fix issues while decision-makers can understand the risk.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to document authorised security assessments, explain findings, assign justified severity scores, and describe remediation.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/miosa-osa/osa/offensive-reporting
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Miosa-osa/OSA --skill offensive-reporting
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Miosa-osa/OSA

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for offensive-reporting

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/offensive-reporting/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/offensive-reporting)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/offensive-reporting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/offensive-reporting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for offensive-reporting

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/offensive-reporting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/offensive-reporting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 200 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,955 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 2 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 86% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00200 $0.03955
Opus 5.5 $0.00080 $0.01582
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00040 $0.00791
Haiku 4.5 $0.00020 $0.00396

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 58487abae18c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

offensive-reporting scanned grade A with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Unrestricted tool accesslowExcessive agency

A wildcard tool grant or "run any command" leaves no least-privilege boundary at all.

`payload`, `RCE`, `XSS`, `LDAP`, `SMB`, `kerberos`, `injection`. Translate every one. ("An attacker could run arbitrary commands on the server" not "RCE via deserialization gadget chain.")

Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

- **Reproduction**: a single curl command if possible, plus the expected vs actual response
Origin

This is a copy

86% identical to offensive-reporting — 40 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

priv/skills/offensive-reporting/SKILL.md · 412 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 412 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Penetration Test Reporting — Professional Methodology

A great finding lost in a bad report is a wasted finding. Reports are the artifact the client pays for, the auditor reads, and the developer fixes from. Treat the report with the same rigor as the exploit.

Quick Workflow

  1. Capture evidence as you exploit — never reconstruct after the fact
  2. Draft each finding immediately while context is fresh; one finding = one numbered file
  3. Build the executive summary last, after all findings are scored
  4. Two-pass review: technical accuracy first, then read-as-CISO for narrative
  5. Hand off with a retest plan and a JSON/CSV index for the client's tracking system

Report Structure (Standard)

1. Executive Summary             ← Last to write, first read
2. Engagement Overview
   2.1 Scope
   2.2 Methodology
   2.3 Limitations / Assumptions
   2.4 Timeline
   2.5 Team
3. Risk Summary                  ← Heatmap, finding count by severity
4. Technical Findings            ← One per finding, sorted by severity
5. Attack Narratives / Chains    ← Critical chains called out separately
6. Strategic Recommendations     ← Programmatic, not finding-by-finding
7. Appendices
   A. Tools Used
   B. Indicators of Compromise (for blue team)
   C. Raw Evidence Pointers
   D. Glossary

Executive Summary — The 90-Second Read

The executive summary is for the CISO, the GRC officer, and the board member. They read this and nothing else.

Structure (one page max):

  1. Engagement context — what was tested, when, by whom (1 sentence)
  2. Headline finding — the worst thing you found, in business terms (2–3 sentences)
  3. Risk verdict — overall posture in plain language (1 paragraph)
  4. Counts — number of findings by severity, in a small table
  5. Top 3 strategic recommendations — programmatic fixes, not "patch CVE-X"

Words to avoid in the executive summary: payload, RCE, XSS, LDAP, SMB, kerberos, injection. Translate every one. ("An attacker could run arbitrary commands on the server" not "RCE via deserialization gadget chain.")

Read the full file on GitHub · 412 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 412 lines · 200 tokens per session scan A 58487abae18c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

offensive-reporting is a skill published in the GitHub repository Miosa-osa/OSA (78 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 200 tokens to every session and 3,955 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 2 findings (unrestricted tool access, makes network calls). It is 86% identical to offensive-reporting, differing in 40 lines, and is treated as a copy.