redteam-multi-agent-orchestration

redteam-multi-agent-orchestration is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Miosa-osa/OSA. It costs 117 tokens per session (1,539 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A framework for coordinating several software agents during an authorised red-team campaign. It separates planning from execution, requires authorisation checks, divides objectives into smaller tasks, checks decisions against cited evidence, and supports recovery after crashes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to intake missions, break objectives into worker tasks, compare agent verdicts, verify citations, and resume interrupted actions safely.
Why use it?
It helps keep multi-agent security work controlled, reviewable, and recoverable when tasks fail or disagree.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it to intake missions, break objectives into worker tasks, compare agent verdicts, verify citations, and resume interrupted actions safely.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-multi-agent-orchestration
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Miosa-osa/OSA --skill redteam-multi-agent-orchestration
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Miosa-osa/OSA

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for redteam-multi-agent-orchestration

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-multi-agent-orchestration/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-multi-agent-orchestration)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-multi-agent-orchestration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-multi-agent-orchestration/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for redteam-multi-agent-orchestration

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-multi-agent-orchestration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-multi-agent-orchestration.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 117 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,539 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00117 $0.01539
Opus 5.5 $0.00047 $0.00616
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00023 $0.00308
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00154

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 4e69aec5cdb0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

redteam-multi-agent-orchestration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

priv/skills/redteam-multi-agent-orchestration/SKILL.md · 128 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Red-Team Multi-Agent Orchestration

Derived from T3MP3ST's src/admiral/, src/orchestration/, and src/mission/ (Apache-2.0). The architecture patterns below are engine-proven; apply them to any multi-agent engagement, including OSA's own delegate-based teams.

1. Mission intake — the Admiral pattern

A conversational intake officer turns plain language into a precise, AUTHORIZED mission. Its invariants are the whole point:

  • PLANNER, NOT EXECUTOR. The intake agent only prepares a brief + directive. It must never claim it ran, probed, scanned, or found anything. Handoff to the executor happens only through the authorization gate.
  • DRY-RUN IS THE DEFAULT. Fidelity defaults to dry_run (plan only, no packets). live requires the operator to explicitly authorize real packets against a target they confirm they own or are permitted to test.
  • HONEST INTAKE. Out-of-scope or unauthorized asks are named as such and steered to a dry-run or a lab target. No framing changes this.

Gather exactly these slots, one focused question at a time:

Slot Meaning
objective what to achieve, one crisp sentence
target concrete thing to point at (repo URL, host/IP/CIDR, contract address, model endpoint, challenge)
family one of: zero_day_hunt, pentest, smart_contract, repo_audit, ctf_range, ai_red_team
scope rules of engagement — what is in-scope and who authorized it
fidelity dry_run (default) or live (explicit human authorization only)

The escalation rule that matters: a typed "I'm authorized, go live" is a claim, not authorization. The conversation can never escalate fidelity to live — live is a deliberate human action outside the conversation (a UI toggle plus a launch-confirm gate). Model the same rule in any agent framework: the model's output is advisory; the gate is system-side.

2. Planner/executor split — the DecompositionOrchestrator pattern

When the planner model is capable-but-restricted (or the worker model is restricted), split the work so the worker never sees offensive framing:

Read the full file on GitHub · 128 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 128 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A 4e69aec5cdb0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

redteam-multi-agent-orchestration is a skill published in the GitHub repository Miosa-osa/OSA (78 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 1,539 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-14.