redteam-report-generation

redteam-report-generation is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Miosa-osa/OSA. It costs 121 tokens per session (1,120 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A report-writing workflow for red-team and penetration-testing engagements, which are authorised security tests. It organises findings by severity, includes evidence and verification status, links issues to CVE and CWE references, and adds remediation guidance and engagement metadata.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to produce Markdown security reports with finding details, evidence labels, status badges, timestamps, mission phases, vulnerability references, and recommended fixes.
Why use it?
It turns test results into a consistent report while reducing formatting errors and preserving evidence and context.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to produce Markdown security reports with finding details, evidence labels, status badges, timestamps, mission phases, vulnerability references, and recommended fixes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-report-generation
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Miosa-osa/OSA --skill redteam-report-generation
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Miosa-osa/OSA

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for redteam-report-generation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-report-generation/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-report-generation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-report-generation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-report-generation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for redteam-report-generation

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-report-generation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miosa-osa/osa/redteam-report-generation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 121 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,120 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00121 $0.01120
Opus 5.5 $0.00048 $0.00448
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00024 $0.00224
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00112

Measured 1mo ago against content hash e99099a320e4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

redteam-report-generation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

priv/skills/redteam-report-generation/SKILL.md · 111 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Red-Team Report Generation

Derived from T3MP3ST's src/reporting/auto-report.ts (Apache-2.0). A report is the engagement's deliverable — structure it so severity, verification status, and evidence are visible at a glance, and write it best-effort so reporting never breaks the mission.

1. Report skeleton

# Engagement Report: <mission name>

- **Status**: <status>
- **Final phase**: <phase>
- **Started**: <ISO-8601>
- **Completed**: <ISO-8601 or —>

## Targets

- <address> (<type>, zone: <zone>, status: <status>)

## Findings (<total>)

### CRITICAL (n)
- **[CRITICAL] <title>** — ✅ verified | ⚠️ unverified (<provenance>)
  - Description: ...
  - CVE: CVE-XXXX-YYYY
  - CWE: CWE-ZZZ
  - Remediation: ...
  - Evidence (output): `<snippet ≤180 chars, whitespace-collapsed>`

### HIGH (n)
...

## Methodology
<what was done, in order, with tool versions>

2. The rules that make the report honest

  • Severity ordering is fixed: critical → high → medium → low → info. Every finding appears under its severity heading with a count.
  • Verification status is stamped on every finding: ✅ verified when the provenance gate passed, ⚠️ unverified (<provenance: none|context>) when it did not. An unverified finding is still reported — it is just labeled. Never silently promote prose to verified.
  • Asserted-vs-derived severity: if the finding asserted a severity that differs from the derived one, show both ((asserted: high)). Disagreement is information, not noise.
  • Evidence snippets are bounded: ≤3 per finding, ≤180 chars each, whitespace-collapsed, type-labeled (output, command, response, log). The full evidence lives in the vault; the report shows the receipt.
  • CVE/CWE cross-references when known — they are the reader's link to public context.
  • Remediation on every actionable finding — a finding without a fix is a complaint, not a report entry.
  • Empty is a result: zero findings renders "no vulnerabilities found" — never an empty section that reads like a generation bug.

Read the full file on GitHub · 111 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 111 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A e99099a320e4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

redteam-report-generation is a skill published in the GitHub repository Miosa-osa/OSA (78 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 1,120 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-14.