Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/miru-zero/zero-brain/auth-secnpx skills add miru-zero/zero-brain --skill auth-secgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/miru-zero/zero-brainWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00561 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
auth-sec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to auth-sec — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Authentication and Authorization Router
This is the routing entry point for authentication, sessions, and authorization boundaries.
Use it to decide whether the issue is mainly login mechanics, object-level authorization, browser trust boundaries, or identity protocols such as OAuth/JWT/SAML before going deeper.
When to Use
- The target includes login, registration, password reset, 2FA, sessions, JWT, OAuth, or SSO
- You suspect object authorization flaws, cross-tenant access, cross-origin reads, CSRF, or protocol misconfiguration
- You need to decide whether to test authentication or authorization first
Skill Map
- Authentication Bypass: login bypass, password reset, 2FA, enumeration, brute-force protections
- IDOR Broken Object Authorization: IDOR, BOLA, BFLA, missing object permissions
- JWT OAuth Token Attacks: algorithm confusion, key trust issues, claim abuse, token forgery
- OAuth OIDC Misconfiguration: redirect URI, state, nonce, PKCE, account binding
- CSRF Cross Site Request Forgery: CSRF tokens, SameSite, JSON CSRF, login CSRF
- CORS Cross Origin Misconfiguration: reflected Origin, credentialed cross-origin reads, allowlist bypass
- SAML SSO Assertion Attacks: assertion wrapping, signature validation, audience, ACS boundaries
Recommended Flow
- First confirm the authentication model and session boundaries
- Then confirm object-level and function-level authorization
- Then move to token, cross-origin, and protocol details
- If enterprise federation exists, continue with OAuth, OIDC, or SAML topics
Related Categories
- api-sec
- Default credentials, username variants, wordlist sizing, and port focus are consolidated in authbypass-authentication-flaws
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 39 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 22b76c166b9e
auth-sec is a skill published in the GitHub repository miru-zero/zero-brain (0 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 561 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to auth-sec, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.