Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to MisonL/Ling. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MisonL/Ling/main/.agents/skills/performance-profiling/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MisonL/LingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/misonl/ling/performance-profiling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/misonl/ling/performance-profiling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/misonl/ling/performance-profiling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/misonl/ling/performance-profiling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/misonl/ling/performance-profiling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.01420 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00568 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00284 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
performance-profiling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
性能分析
测量、分析、优化 —— 必须严格遵循此顺序。
运行脚本
执行以下脚本进行自动化性能分析：
| 脚本 | 用途 | 执行命令 |
|---|---|---|
scripts/lighthouse_audit.py |
Lighthouse（性能审计工具）审计 | python scripts/lighthouse_audit.py https://example.com |
1. 核心 Web 指标
核心 Web 指标（Core Web Vitals）用于衡量加载与交互质量。
目标值
| 指标 | 优（Good） | 劣（Poor） | 衡量维度 |
|---|---|---|---|
| LCP | < 2.5s | > 4.0s | 加载体验 |
| INP | < 200ms | > 500ms | 交互响应 |
| CLS | < 0.1 | > 0.25 | 视觉稳定性 |
何时进行测量
| 阶段 | 工具选择 |
|---|---|
| 开发环境（Development） | 本地 Lighthouse |
| CI/CD 流程 | Lighthouse CI（持续集成） |
| 生产环境（Production） | RUM（真实用户监控，Real User Monitoring） |
2. 性能分析工作流
四步走流程
1. 建立基准（Baseline）-> 测量当前状态
2. 识别瓶颈（Identify）-> 找出性能卡点
3. 实施修复（Fix） -> 进行针对性改动
4. 验证改进（Validate）-> 确认性能提升
分析工具选择建议
| 待解决问题 | 推荐工具 |
|---|---|
| 页面加载速度 | Lighthouse |
| 打包体积（Bundle size） | Bundle analyzer（包分析器） |
| 运行时性能 | DevTools（开发者工具）Performance（性能）面板 |
| 内存占用 | DevTools（开发者工具）Memory（内存）面板 |
| 网络请求 | DevTools（开发者工具）Network（网络）面板 |
3. 打包产物分析
观察重点
| 潜在问题 | 识别指标 |
|---|---|
| 巨大的外部依赖 | 位于打包产物顶部 |
| 冗余/重复代码 | 存在于多个 Chunk（代码块）中 |
| 未使用的代码 | 低覆盖率（Coverage） |
| 缺失分包（Splitting） | 产物呈现为一个巨大的单体文件 |
优化手段
| 发现的问题 | 对应动作 |
|---|---|
| 库文件过大 | 按需导入（Import specific modules） |
| 依赖项重复 | 去重（Dedupe）、更新版本 |
| 主包代码包含路由逻辑 | 实施代码分割（Code split） |
| 存在未引用的导出 | 启用 Tree shake（摇树优化） |
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 150 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A f675493c20eb
performance-profiling is a skill published in the GitHub repository MisonL/Ling (8 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,420 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
debug-optimize-lcp
Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…
systematic-debugging
Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.
log-error-digest
Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…
cwv-optimizer
Diagnose and fix Core Web Vitals issues on AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Goes deeper than generic CWV advice by understanding EDS-specific performance patterns including the 100KB LCP budget, E-L-D loading phases, block rendering behavior, and third-party script impact. Produces specific fixes for LCP, CLS, and…
incident-response-incident-response
Coordinate production incident triage, mitigation, investigation, recovery, and follow-up. Use when responding to outages or other incidents that require structured operational coordination.
ci-fixer
CI failures - read error, minimal fix, verify.