Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mission69b/t2000 --skill t2000-sui-platformgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mission69b/t2000Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mission69b/t2000/t2000-sui-platform)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mission69b/t2000/t2000-sui-platform"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mission69b/t2000/t2000-sui-platform/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mission69b/t2000/t2000-sui-platform"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mission69b/t2000/t2000-sui-platform.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00151 | $0.01851 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00076 | $0.00925 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00370 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00185 |
Grade A, and why
t2000-sui-platform scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sui Address Balances + Gasless Stablecoin Transfers
Two Sui platform features that change how we architect any high-throughput payer (the Model B settlement float, the MPP gateway, future agent custody) and any gas-free user send (Audric Pay → creator payouts, send-to-email claim links). Read before assuming a single Sui address serializes, or before adding SUI-for-gas onboarding friction.
TL;DR — the two patterns
| Pattern | What it gives you |
|---|---|
| Address Balances (SIP-58) | Fungible assets held as ONE accumulator balance at the address, not a scatter of Coin<T> objects. Concurrent debits are accumulator mutations → no owned-object lock → a single address is no longer single-threaded. Pairs with non-sequential nonces (many in-flight txs, keyed by digest not a serial counter). Gas can be paid from the balance (enable_address_balance_gas_payments). |
| Gasless stablecoin transfers | Move USDC without holding SUI — gas is sponsored or paid in-asset. Removes the onboarding wall and the SUI gas coin as a contention object on a busy payer. |
Docs: docs.sui.io/onchain-finance/asset-custody/address-balances/using-address-balances
· docs.sui.io/develop/transaction-payment/gasless-stablecoin-transfers
The myth these kill: "one Sui address can only do one tx at a time"
The classic owned-object model serializes a wallet on TWO objects:
- The gas coin (every tx mutates it) → equivocation risk under concurrency.
- The payload coin being spent (owned
Coin<T>).
That's why the client-side consumer path ships enqueueWalletWrite (the
equivocation queue) — correct for one human wallet doing occasional writes.
A high-throughput server payer must NOT inherit that constraint:
- Address Balances remove #2 (accumulator, not owned object).
- Address-balance gas payments / gasless transfers remove #1.
- Non-sequential nonces let many settlement txs be in flight at once.
→ A single settlement address scales. A wallet fleet is an OPTIONAL lever for blast-radius isolation or extreme headroom — never a scaling prerequisite.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 126 lines · 151 tokens per session scan A e56b3023507b
t2000-sui-platform is a skill published in the GitHub repository mission69b/t2000 (23 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 151 tokens to every session and 1,851 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
swarmwage-publish
Publish your agent's capabilities to the Swarmwage registry and earn USDC for each call. Lets your agent advertise services (image generation, audio transcription, charting, custom domain workflows…) on the open agent hire protocol — other AI agents discover you, hire you with one function call, and pay you in USDC on…
debridge
Complete deBridge Protocol SDK for building cross-chain bridges, message passing, and token transfers on Solana. Use when building cross-chain applications, bridging assets between Solana and EVM chains, or implementing trustless external calls.
near-intents
Cross-chain token swap integration using NEAR Intents 1Click API. Use when building swap widgets, bridge interfaces, or multi-chain transfers across EVM, Solana, NEAR, TON, Stellar, and Tron.
x402
HTTP 402 payment protocol for AI agent commerce — three-actor model (Client, Resource Server, Facilitator), ERC-3009 transferWithAuthorization, server middleware (@x402/express), client patterns in TypeScript and Python, facilitator integration, agent-to-agent payments, pricing strategies, and replay protection. Works…
x402-server
Add x402 payment protection to any API endpoint using @dexterai/x402/server. Trigger when the user wants to monetize an API, add a paywall, accept crypto payments on their server, set up Stripe settlement, configure dynamic pricing, create access passes, or enable sponsored access (ads for agents).
agent-payment-stats
Cross-protocol agent-economy payment metrics from Barker's index. x402 (Base) volume is on-chain verifiable; ACP / AP2 / MPP / AP4M figures are self-reported claims. Separates real vs nominal volume by filtering wash/noise sellers. Use when users ask about x402 volume, agent payment stats, agent economy metrics, or…