agentic-engineering

A working method for software projects where AI agents do much of the implementation and people set quality and risk controls.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to break projects into independently checkable tasks, test behavior before and after changes, and route work according to its complexity.
Why use it?
It replaces vague agent work with clear completion checks, smaller tasks, appropriate model choices, and tests that reveal regressions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mit-network/everything-claude-code/agentic-engineering
Any agent
npx skills add mit-network/everything-claude-code --skill agentic-engineering
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mit-network/everything-claude-code

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 40 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 862 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00040 $0.00862
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.00431
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00172
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00086

Measured 2d ago against content hash f2d7427f30ae, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

agentic-engineering scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to agentic-engineering — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.kiro/skills/agentic-engineering/SKILL.md · 136 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Agentic Engineering

Use this skill for engineering workflows where AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.

Operating Principles

  1. Define completion criteria before execution.
  2. Decompose work into agent-sized units.
  3. Route model tiers by task complexity.
  4. Measure with evals and regression checks.

Eval-First Loop

  1. Define capability eval and regression eval.
  2. Run baseline and capture failure signatures.
  3. Execute implementation.
  4. Re-run evals and compare deltas.

Example workflow:

1. Write test that captures desired behavior (eval)
2. Run test → capture baseline failures
3. Implement feature
4. Re-run test → verify improvements
5. Check for regressions in other tests

Task Decomposition

Apply the 15-minute unit rule:

  • Each unit should be independently verifiable
  • Each unit should have a single dominant risk
  • Each unit should expose a clear done condition

Good decomposition:

Task: Add user authentication
├─ Unit 1: Add password hashing (15 min, security risk)
├─ Unit 2: Create login endpoint (15 min, API contract risk)
├─ Unit 3: Add session management (15 min, state risk)
└─ Unit 4: Protect routes with middleware (15 min, auth logic risk)

Bad decomposition:

Task: Add user authentication (2 hours, multiple risks)

Model Routing

Choose model tier based on task complexity:

  • Haiku: Classification, boilerplate transforms, narrow edits

    • Example: Rename variable, add type annotation, format code
  • Sonnet: Implementation and refactors

    • Example: Implement feature, refactor module, write tests
  • Opus: Architecture, root-cause analysis, multi-file invariants

    • Example: Design system, debug complex issue, review architecture

Cost discipline: Escalate model tier only when lower tier fails with a clear reasoning gap.

Session Strategy

  • Continue session for closely-coupled units
    • Example: Implementing related functions in same module

Read the full file on GitHub · 136 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 136 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A f2d7427f30ae

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agentic-engineering is a skill published in the GitHub repository mit-network/everything-claude-code (76 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 862 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to agentic-engineering, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens