Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mits-pl/wove. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mits-pl/wove/main/.claude/skills/seo-technical/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mits-pl/woveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mits-pl/wove/seo-technical)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mits-pl/wove/seo-technical"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mits-pl/wove/seo-technical/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mits-pl/wove/seo-technical"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mits-pl/wove/seo-technical.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.01924 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00770 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00385 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
seo-technical scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to seo-technical — 19 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 175 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Technical SEO Audit
Categories
1. Crawlability
- robots.txt: exists, valid, not blocking important resources
- XML sitemap: exists, referenced in robots.txt, valid format
- Noindex tags: intentional vs accidental
- Crawl depth: important pages within 3 clicks of homepage
- JavaScript rendering: check if critical content requires JS execution
- Crawl budget: for large sites (>10k pages), efficiency matters
AI Crawler Management
As of 2025-2026, AI companies actively crawl the web to train models and power AI search. Managing these crawlers via robots.txt is a critical technical SEO consideration.
Known AI crawlers:
| Crawler | Company | robots.txt token | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPTBot | OpenAI | GPTBot |
Model training |
| ChatGPT-User | OpenAI | ChatGPT-User |
Real-time browsing |
| ClaudeBot | Anthropic | ClaudeBot |
Model training |
| PerplexityBot | Perplexity | PerplexityBot |
Search index + training |
| Bytespider | ByteDance | Bytespider |
Model training |
| Google-Extended | Google-Extended |
Gemini training (NOT search) | |
| CCBot | Common Crawl | CCBot |
Open dataset |
Key distinctions:
- Blocking
Google-Extendedprevents Gemini training use but does NOT affect Google Search indexing or AI Overviews (those useGooglebot) - Blocking
GPTBotprevents OpenAI training but does NOT prevent ChatGPT from citing your content via browsing (ChatGPT-User) - ~3-5% of websites now use AI-specific robots.txt rules
Example, selective AI crawler blocking:
# Allow search indexing, block AI training crawlers
User-agent: GPTBot
Disallow: /
User-agent: Google-Extended
Disallow: /
User-agent: Bytespider
Disallow: /
# Allow all other crawlers (including Googlebot for search)
User-agent: *
Allow: /
Recommendation: Consider your AI visibility strategy before blocking. Being cited by AI systems drives brand awareness and referral traffic. Cross-reference the seo-geo skill for full AI visibility optimization.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 175 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 8da802143d72
seo-technical is a skill published in the GitHub repository mits-pl/wove (42 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 1,924 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to seo-technical, differing in 19 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
build-teaql-app
Build or change a TeaQL application in Java, Rust, Go, Swift, Python, C#/.NET, or TypeScript, including Kotlin/JVM applications that consume Java-generated libraries. Mandatory order: first draft and save a complete KSML model, then verify the client and evaluate that saved model, repair it through repeated evaluation…
batch-api
Prepare a many-file, single-turn transform (translate, rewrite, extract) as a plan and submit it to the asynchronous, half-price DashScope Batch API; results are delivered as new files hours later. Invoke explicitly with /batch-api.
repo-hygiene
Use when the scheduled repo-hygiene workflow runs from GitHub Actions (or an operator dry-run) to scan the repository for small, certain docs/test/code hygiene issues and fix them as one batched branch.
test-failure-explorer
Import and query an existing Vitest 3.2 JSON report to explore test failures, file-level errors and original diagnostic evidence.
coordinate
Coordinate a small team of Qwen Code teammates with enforced read-only workers, an optional worktree-pinned writer, shared tasks, peer messages, and existing Agent View tabs. Invoke explicitly with /coordinate.
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…