Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mmornati/leanproxy-mcp --skill bmad-technical-researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mmornati/leanproxy-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mmornati/leanproxy-mcp/bmad-technical-research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mmornati/leanproxy-mcp/bmad-technical-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mmornati/leanproxy-mcp/bmad-technical-research.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01075 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00537 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00215 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-technical-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
81% identical to bmad-domain-research — 38 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Technical Research Workflow
Goal: Conduct comprehensive technical research using current web data and verified sources to produce complete research documents with compelling narratives and proper citations.
Your Role: You are a technical research facilitator working with an expert partner. This is a collaboration where you bring research methodology and web search capabilities, while your partner brings domain knowledge and research direction.
Conventions
- Bare paths (e.g.
technical-steps/step-01-init.md) resolve from the skill root. {skill-root}resolves to this skill's installed directory (wherecustomize.tomllives).{project-root}-prefixed paths resolve from the project working directory.{skill-name}resolves to the skill directory's basename.
PREREQUISITE
⛔ Web search required. If unavailable, abort and tell the user.
On Activation
Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block
Run: python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow
If the script fails, resolve the workflow block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:
{skill-root}/customize.toml— defaults{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml— team overrides{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml— personal overrides
Any missing file is skipped. Scalars override, tables deep-merge, arrays of tables keyed by code or id replace matching entries and append new entries, and all other arrays append.
Step 2: Execute Prepend Steps
Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_prepend} in order before proceeding.
Step 3: Load Persistent Facts
Treat every entry in {workflow.persistent_facts} as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run. Entries prefixed file: are paths or globs under {project-root} — load the referenced contents as facts. All other entries are facts verbatim.
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- customize.toml 1.6 KB
- research.template.md 581 B
- technical-steps/step-01-init.md 5.5 KB
- technical-steps/step-02-technical-overview.md 9.2 KB
- technical-steps/step-03-integration-patterns.md 9.8 KB
- technical-steps/step-04-architectural-patterns.md 7.0 KB
- technical-steps/step-05-implementation-research.md 7.6 KB
- technical-steps/step-06-research-synthesis.md 21 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 97 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 290c5aec8888
bmad-technical-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository mmornati/leanproxy-mcp (5 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,075 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to bmad-domain-research, differing in 38 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
cn-check
Install and run the Continue CLI (cn) to execute AI agent checks on local code changes. Use when asked to "run checks", "lint with AI", "review my changes with cn", or set up Continue CI locally.
use-modern-go
Use the Modern Go Guidelines CLI whenever writing, modifying, fixing, or refactoring Go code. Apply its version-specific guidance to generated changes.
gograph
Go repository intelligence for Claude Code. Use when reading, navigating, editing, reviewing, or refactoring a Go codebase. Exposes 64 query, analysis, and workflow capabilities through the local gograph MCP server, including bounded first-call exploration, AST-aware call graphs, blast-radius analysis, impact, and…
lsp-inspect
Full code quality audit for a file, package, or directory. Supports batch mode (directory walk with --top ranking), comparison mode (--diff for branch-only issues), severity calibration by blast radius, fix suggestions, and confidence tiers. Applies a check taxonomy (dead symbols, silent failures, error wrapping…
lsp-refactor
End-to-end safe refactor workflow — blast-radius analysis, speculative preview, apply to disk, verify build, run affected tests. Inlines lsp-impact + lsp-safe-edit + lsp-verify + lsp-test-correlation into one coordinated sequence.
lsp-dead-code
Enumerate exported symbols in a file and surface those with zero references across the workspace. Use when auditing for dead code, cleaning up APIs, or checking which exports are safe to remove.