Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add moabualruz/fulcrum --skill pmdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/moabualruz/fulcrumWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/moabualruz/fulcrum/pmd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/moabualruz/fulcrum/pmd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/moabualruz/fulcrum/pmd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/moabualruz/fulcrum/pmd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/moabualruz/fulcrum/pmd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.00218 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00087 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00044 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
pmd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to bat — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
pmd
When to use
See references/when-to-use.md. Load only when this section is needed.
Invocation
See references/invocation.md. Load only when this section is needed.
Patterns
See references/patterns.md. Load only when this section is needed.
Anti-patterns
See references/anti-patterns.md. Load only when this section is needed.
Cross-refs
See references/cross-refs.md. Load only when this section is needed.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 28 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 6b0ecef9e51e
pmd is a skill published in the GitHub repository moabualruz/fulcrum (7 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 218 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to bat, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ponytail-audit
Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. Use when the user says "audit this codebase", "audit for over-engineering", "what can I delete from this repo", "find…
ponytail-review
Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this…
omk-code-review
Review implementation changes against contracts and real failure modes, preserve minimal patches, and verify regressions without confusing test counts, generated code volume or CI claims with production correctness.
architecture-audit
Systematic architecture audit and refactoring methodology for Rust + TypeScript codebases. Use when performing refactoring, cleanup, unification, code review, dead code removal, module reorganization, or tech debt elimination. Ensures no naming confusion, semantic overloading, hidden defaults, duplicate logic, or…
ai-driven-code-editor-cli
OpenCode AI - AI-driven code editor/IDE (CLI/TUI version of Cursor/Windsurf). Use when: (1) AI-assisted coding tasks, (2) Code refactoring with AI, (3) GitHub PR review/fixes, (4) Multi-file edits requiring context, (5) Running AI agents on codebases. NOT for: simple one-line ed…
adversarial-implementation-review-coach
Adversarial implementation review based on Block's g3 dialectical autocoding research. Use when validating implementation completeness against requirements with fresh objectivity.