pre-commit-review

pre-commit-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit. It costs 21 tokens per session (2,366 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A pre-commit check that reviews changes prepared for a Git commit, with a focus on security and compliance rules.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before committing staged code to run the project's static checks and an additional review of the changed files.
Why use it?
It catches critical problems in the changes about to be committed, so issues are found before they enter the project's history.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Installs and runs on its own, but its text points at files inside its plugin — anything it tells you to read at a ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} path is only there once the plugin is installed. Installing the plugin gets both.

Part of the mtk plugin — 45 skills, 6 agents, 7 hooks, 1 MCP server shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/pre-commit-review
Any agent
npx skills add moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit --skill pre-commit-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install mtk, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 45 skills, 6 agents, 7 hooks, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pre-commit-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/pre-commit-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/pre-commit-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/pre-commit-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/pre-commit-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 21 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,366 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00021 $0.02366
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.01183
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00473
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00237

Measured 4d ago against content hash 0faa0974c0e6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pre-commit-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Reads agent configuration directorieslowAgent snooping

.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.

4. Otherwise, fall back to `find ~/.claude/plugins -maxdepth 8 -name "pre-commit-linters.sh" -path "*/mtk/*" -type f 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1 | sed 's|/hooks/pre-commit-linters.sh||'`. If empty, skip the linter pa

Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.

.claude/skills/pre-commit-review/SKILL.md · 147 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Pre-Commit Security Review

MTK File Resolution

MTK files (hooks/, .claude/references/, .claude/review-config.json) live either in the project (local install) or the plugin cache (marketplace install). Resolve once:

  1. If $MTK_HELPER_ROOT is set, prefix hooks/, .claude/references/, and .claude/review-config.json reads with it — a pinned checkout wins over every other source.
  2. Otherwise, if $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT is set, prefix them with that.
  3. Otherwise, if hooks/pre-commit-linters.sh exists locally → project-relative paths work as-is.
  4. Otherwise, fall back to find ~/.claude/plugins -maxdepth 8 -name "pre-commit-linters.sh" -path "*/mtk/*" -type f 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1 | sed 's|/hooks/pre-commit-linters.sh||'. If empty, skip the linter pass and run the AI review only.

Run a fast, security-focused review on staged changes only. This is the lightweight check engineers should run before every commit.

Process

  1. Get the staged diff: git diff --cached
  2. If nothing staged, check unstaged: git diff
  3. If nothing at all, tell the engineer there's nothing to review
  4. Run the static linter pass first: bash hooks/pre-commit-linters.sh
    • Emits deterministic findings with source: "linter" and confidence: 100
    • Findings include secrets, raw SQL interpolation, connection strings with plaintext passwords, AWS keys, JWTs, and stack-specific patterns
    • Merge linter findings into your final JSON output (they always pass the threshold, so they always surface) 4.5. Merge cached analyzer output (if available). If .mtk/analyzer-output.json exists and was modified within the last 10 minutes, read it and filter findings to only those whose file field matches a file in git diff --cached --name-only (or git diff --name-only if using unstaged). Discard all other findings — surfacing repo-wide warnings on an unrelated commit erodes trust in the gate. Merge the filtered set into your output with source: "analyzer" and confidence: 100. Do NOT run the build yourself — the pre-commit gate must stay fast (seconds, not minutes). Only consume cached output. 4.6. Roslyn MCP tools (if available, .NET only). If dotnet-claude-kit is installed and the DetectAntiPatterns tool is available, call it on the changed files for on-demand semantic analysis. Treat results as source: "analyzer", confidence: 100. This is fast (analyzes specific files, not full build) and catches EF Core, async, and disposal patterns that the regex linter misses. If the tool is not available, skip this step. 4.6. Collateral-churn check. Run bash hooks/collateral-guard.sh --cached (add --manifest docs/specs/<date>-<slug>.json when this commit belongs to a spec). It answers a question no other check asks: is this churn yours? It flags whitespace/EOL-only rewrites (a small edit to a CRLF file rewrites the whole file), generated artifacts riding along undeclared (one npm install drags a lockfile into a feature commit), and asset directories regenerated wholesale. Findings are warnings, not blocks — but each carries a working revert command, and a commit whose diff is mostly collateral hides the real change from every reviewer downstream. The dependency gate below is the separate, stricter question of what the lockfile churn contains.

Read the full file on GitHub · 147 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 147 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 0faa0974c0e6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pre-commit-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit (7 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 2,366 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

tooluniverse-drug-research

Comprehensive drug profiling — mechanism, primary/secondary targets, drug interactions, clinical-trial status, adverse events (FAERS), pharmacogenomics, and approval history. Use for full drug investigation reports, 'tell me about drug X' queries, and assembling drug profiles for clinicians, researchers, or regulatory…

mims-harvard/ToolUniverse · 71 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

catalyst-center-readonly

Query Cisco Catalyst Center read-only — device inventory, site hierarchy, wireless, assurance health, compliance, software images, events. All 514 read-only API operations reachable through 8 grouped dispatchers. Use when asked what Catalyst Center manages, where a device sits, what its health or compliance state is…

automateyournetwork/netclaw · 78 tokens

build-audit-logs

Build or review audit trails in TypeScript/JavaScript apps using evlog (pipelines, typed actions, denials, retention, compliance-style reviews). For application code, not for extending the evlog package.

activepieces/activepieces · 49 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens