Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/pre-commit-reviewnpx skills add moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit --skill pre-commit-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/pre-commit-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/pre-commit-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/pre-commit-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.02366 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01183 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00473 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00237 |
Grade A, and why
pre-commit-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directorieslowAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
4. Otherwise, fall back to `find ~/.claude/plugins -maxdepth 8 -name "pre-commit-linters.sh" -path "*/mtk/*" -type f 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1 | sed 's|/hooks/pre-commit-linters.sh||'`. If empty, skip the linter pa Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pre-Commit Security Review
MTK File Resolution
MTK files (hooks/, .claude/references/, .claude/review-config.json) live either in the project (local install) or the plugin cache (marketplace install). Resolve once:
- If
$MTK_HELPER_ROOTis set, prefixhooks/,.claude/references/, and.claude/review-config.jsonreads with it — a pinned checkout wins over every other source. - Otherwise, if
$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOTis set, prefix them with that. - Otherwise, if
hooks/pre-commit-linters.shexists locally → project-relative paths work as-is. - Otherwise, fall back to
find ~/.claude/plugins -maxdepth 8 -name "pre-commit-linters.sh" -path "*/mtk/*" -type f 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1 | sed 's|/hooks/pre-commit-linters.sh||'. If empty, skip the linter pass and run the AI review only.
Run a fast, security-focused review on staged changes only. This is the lightweight check engineers should run before every commit.
Process
- Get the staged diff:
git diff --cached - If nothing staged, check unstaged:
git diff - If nothing at all, tell the engineer there's nothing to review
- Run the static linter pass first:
bash hooks/pre-commit-linters.sh- Emits deterministic findings with
source: "linter"andconfidence: 100 - Findings include secrets, raw SQL interpolation, connection strings with plaintext passwords, AWS keys, JWTs, and stack-specific patterns
- Merge linter findings into your final JSON output (they always pass the
threshold, so they always surface)
4.5. Merge cached analyzer output (if available). If
.mtk/analyzer-output.jsonexists and was modified within the last 10 minutes, read it and filter findings to only those whosefilefield matches a file ingit diff --cached --name-only(orgit diff --name-onlyif using unstaged). Discard all other findings — surfacing repo-wide warnings on an unrelated commit erodes trust in the gate. Merge the filtered set into your output withsource: "analyzer"andconfidence: 100. Do NOT run the build yourself — the pre-commit gate must stay fast (seconds, not minutes). Only consume cached output. 4.6. Roslyn MCP tools (if available, .NET only). Ifdotnet-claude-kitis installed and theDetectAntiPatternstool is available, call it on the changed files for on-demand semantic analysis. Treat results assource: "analyzer",confidence: 100. This is fast (analyzes specific files, not full build) and catches EF Core, async, and disposal patterns that the regex linter misses. If the tool is not available, skip this step. 4.6. Collateral-churn check. Runbash hooks/collateral-guard.sh --cached(add--manifest docs/specs/<date>-<slug>.jsonwhen this commit belongs to a spec). It answers a question no other check asks: is this churn yours? It flags whitespace/EOL-only rewrites (a small edit to a CRLF file rewrites the whole file), generated artifacts riding along undeclared (onenpm installdrags a lockfile into a feature commit), and asset directories regenerated wholesale. Findings are warnings, not blocks — but each carries a working revert command, and a commit whose diff is mostly collateral hides the real change from every reviewer downstream. The dependency gate below is the separate, stricter question of what the lockfile churn contains.
- Emits deterministic findings with
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 147 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 0faa0974c0e6
pre-commit-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit (7 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 2,366 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
tooluniverse-drug-research
Comprehensive drug profiling — mechanism, primary/secondary targets, drug interactions, clinical-trial status, adverse events (FAERS), pharmacogenomics, and approval history. Use for full drug investigation reports, 'tell me about drug X' queries, and assembling drug profiles for clinicians, researchers, or regulatory…
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
catalyst-center-readonly
Query Cisco Catalyst Center read-only — device inventory, site hierarchy, wireless, assurance health, compliance, software images, events. All 514 read-only API operations reachable through 8 grouped dispatchers. Use when asked what Catalyst Center manages, where a device sits, what its health or compliance state is…
build-audit-logs
Build or review audit trails in TypeScript/JavaScript apps using evlog (pipelines, typed actions, denials, retention, compliance-style reviews). For application code, not for extending the evlog package.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…