AI Agent Skills is a curated library and package manager for installing, organizing, and creating skills for compatible AI coding agents. It is for developers who want to manage reusable agent instructions through a command-line or terminal interface. The catalogue skills and agents are examples of the kind of add-ons it helps manage.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MoizIbnYousaf/Ai-Agent-Skills --skill llm-application-devgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MoizIbnYousaf/Ai-Agent-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/moizibnyousaf/ai-agent-skills/llm-application-dev)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/moizibnyousaf/ai-agent-skills/llm-application-dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/moizibnyousaf/ai-agent-skills/llm-application-dev/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/moizibnyousaf/ai-agent-skills/llm-application-dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/moizibnyousaf/ai-agent-skills/llm-application-dev.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01267 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00633 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00253 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
llm-application-dev scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- llm-application-dev — 92% identical, 1 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 218 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LLM Application Development
Prompt Engineering
Structured Prompts
const systemPrompt = `You are a helpful assistant that answers questions about our product.
RULES:
- Only answer questions about our product
- If you don't know, say "I don't know"
- Keep responses concise (under 100 words)
- Never make up information
CONTEXT:
{context}`;
const userPrompt = `Question: {question}`;
Few-Shot Examples
const prompt = `Classify the sentiment of customer feedback.
Examples:
Input: "Love this product!"
Output: positive
Input: "Worst purchase ever"
Output: negative
Input: "It works fine"
Output: neutral
Input: "${customerFeedback}"
Output:`;
Chain of Thought
const prompt = `Solve this step by step:
Question: ${question}
Let's think through this:
1. First, identify the key information
2. Then, determine the approach
3. Finally, calculate the answer
Step-by-step solution:`;
API Integration
OpenAI Pattern
import OpenAI from 'openai';
const openai = new OpenAI({ apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY });
async function chat(messages: Message[]): Promise<string> {
const response = await openai.chat.completions.create({
model: 'gpt-4',
messages,
temperature: 0.7,
max_tokens: 500,
});
return response.choices[0].message.content ?? '';
}
Anthropic Pattern
import Anthropic from '@anthropic-ai/sdk';
const anthropic = new Anthropic({ apiKey: process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY });
async function chat(prompt: string): Promise<string> {
const response = await anthropic.messages.create({
model: 'claude-3-opus-20240229',
max_tokens: 1024,
messages: [{ role: 'user', content: prompt }],
});
return response.content[0].type === 'text'
? response.content[0].text
: '';
}
Streaming Responses
async function* streamChat(prompt: string) {
const stream = await openai.chat.completions.create({
model: 'gpt-4',
messages: [{ role: 'user', content: prompt }],
stream: true,
});
for await (const chunk of stream) {
const content = chunk.choices[0]?.delta?.content;
if (content) yield content;
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 218 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A a00e729ae907
llm-application-dev is a skill published in the GitHub repository MoizIbnYousaf/Ai-Agent-Skills (1,134 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,267 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
sqlite-vec-skilld
ALWAYS use when writing code importing "sqlite-vec". Consult for debugging, best practices, or modifying sqlite-vec, sqlite vec.
audit-langfuse-llm
Run a PDCA quality audit on LLM/AI features: traces, prompts, costs, evals, grounding, hallucination. Use for "audit LLM quality", "check Langfuse", "audit prompts", "check AI quality", "audit AI costs", "check traces". Jailbreak/OWASP LLM → audit-llm-security. Token caps → plan-llm-cost-guardrails.
ai-automation
Workflow automation skills using AI. Build chatbots, automate repetitive tasks, integrate LLMs into pipelines, design intent-based assistants. Triggers on: chatbot, automation, workflow, AI agent, RAG, LLM integration, intent recognition, conversation design.
prompt-engineer
Transform rough prompts/ideas into production-ready LLM prompts. Use when crafting, refining, or optimizing prompts for any AI model (Codex, GPT, Llama, etc.) with advanced techniques like CoT, constitutional AI, RAG optimization.
ai-expertise-engine
Comprehensive AI/ML expertise covering prompt engineering, LLM architecture, AI agent design, RAG systems, fine-tuning, AI safety, and cutting-edge AI research for building and leveraging AI systems.
audit-llm-security
Read-only OWASP LLM Top 10 audit of app-facing AI: prompt injection, data leakage, unsafe output/agency, RAG risks, misinformation, and unbounded spend. Use when "audit LLM security", "prompt injection", "jailbreak my chatbot", or "is my AI safe?". General app security → audit-security.