Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add momentmaker/kaijutsu --skill scope-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/momentmaker/kaijutsuWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/momentmaker/kaijutsu/scope-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/momentmaker/kaijutsu/scope-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/momentmaker/kaijutsu/scope-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/momentmaker/kaijutsu/scope-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/momentmaker/kaijutsu/scope-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.01188 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00475 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00238 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
scope-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scope Check
Hold up a mirror — compare the original task intent to the actual work done. Present data, not judgment.
Step 1: Find the Original Intent
Check these sources in order. Use the first one found:
- Active plan file — search your agent's plan/scratch directory for a plan referencing this project. Read the Goal and Context sections.
- Task list — if your agent has a tracked task list, the earliest task often captures the original intent.
- Ask the user — if neither exists, ask: "What was the original task or goal? I want to compare it to what's actually happened."
Step 2: Measure the Actual Work
Detect default branch first: git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's|refs/remotes/origin/||' — fall back to main if unset.
Run in parallel:
git diff --stat— unstaged changesgit diff --cached --stat— staged changesgit diff {default-branch}...HEAD --stat— all changes on this branch vs default (skip if current branch IS the default branch)git ls-files --others --exclude-standard | wc -l— new untracked files- Count new vs modified files
- Sum lines added/removed
Step 3: Categorize by Concern
Group changed files by their top-level directory or domain:
- Read the list of changed files
- Group by the first 2 path segments (e.g.,
Models/Proximity/,Scenes/ActiveWalk/,src/handlers/) - Count files and lines per group
Step 4: Check Time Spent
If your agent keeps a session log, count sessions and estimate total time spent on this project today and yesterday.
Step 4.5: Cost-tier classification
For each changed file, classify by reasoning space per the Agentic Coding Flywheel cost model:
| Tier | What it touches | Rework cost |
|---|---|---|
| plan-space | design docs, plans, architecture markdown, ADRs, READMEs | 1× |
| bead-space | task lists, scope-of-work specs, project tracking, IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md, .beads/* |
5× |
| code-space | actual implementation files, tests, configs | 25× |
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 105 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 63583f0809b9
scope-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository momentmaker/kaijutsu (3 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,188 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
batch-api
Prepare a many-file, single-turn transform (translate, rewrite, extract) as a plan and submit it to the asynchronous, half-price DashScope Batch API; results are delivered as new files hours later. Invoke explicitly with /batch-api.
gws-calendar
Google Calendar: Manage calendars and events.
gws-gmail-send
Skill "gws-gmail-send" from googleworkspace/cli, covering gmail +send, usage, flags, examples and tips.
gws-gmail-watch
Gmail: Watch for new emails and stream them as NDJSON.
gws-gmail
Gmail: Send, read, and manage email.
obsidian-bases
Create and edit Obsidian Bases (.base files) with views, filters, formulas, and summaries. Use when working with .base files, creating database-like views of notes, or when the user mentions Bases, table views, card views, filters, or formulas in Obsidian.