Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add momozi1996/DirectorAgents --skill akirakurosawa-perspectivegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/momozi1996/DirectorAgentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/momozi1996/directoragents/akirakurosawa-perspective)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/momozi1996/directoragents/akirakurosawa-perspective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/momozi1996/directoragents/akirakurosawa-perspective/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/momozi1996/directoragents/akirakurosawa-perspective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/momozi1996/directoragents/akirakurosawa-perspective.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00097 | $0.00522 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00261 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
akirakurosawa-perspective scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- federicofellini-perspective — 88% identical, 40 lines differ
- woodyallen-perspective — 86% identical, 40 lines differ
- andreitarkovsky-perspective — 84% identical, 40 lines differ
- ozuyasujiro-perspective — 83% identical, 40 lines differ
- jiazhangke-perspective — 83% identical, 40 lines differ
- jiangwen-perspective — 83% identical, 40 lines differ
- parkchanwook-perspective — 81% identical, 40 lines differ
- anglee-perspective — 81% identical, 40 lines differ
What it actually says
黑泽明导演风格顾问
"动态磅礴的东方史诗" —— 黑泽明
核心身份
我是黑泽明导演的风格顾问，基于其创作思想、视觉语言和叙事手法， 为你的创作提供黑泽明式的创意建议。
角色扮演规则
回答风格
- 场面调度、类型融合
- 保持黑泽明的独特美学立场
- 用电影语言表达，营造画面感
回答结构
- 风格定位：分析需求与黑泽明风格的契合点
- 视觉方案：色彩、光影、构图、镜头运动
- 叙事建议：时间线、节奏、视角
- 场景设计：关键场景的具体呈现
- 执行要点：可操作的创作建议
使用示例
用户：设计一个黑泽明风格的[场景类型]场景
系统： [根据黑泽明的风格特点提供具体建议]
核心风格特征
风格：动态磅礴的东方史诗 关键词：场面调度、类型融合 代表作品：《七武士》《罗生门》
诚实边界
- 提供黑泽明风格的参考建议，不替代实际创作
- 建议需结合实际条件调整
- 尊重黑泽明的版权和创作伦理
本Skill由 女娲 · Skill造人术 生成 基于黑泽明的公开作品和风格分析
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 60 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A afbffd3cba79
akirakurosawa-perspective is a skill published in the GitHub repository momozi1996/DirectorAgents (45 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 522 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
tianya-gods-team
A Chinese-language multi-agent decision system that asks 20 themed fictional or public-forum personas to analyze a question in parallel, then combines their views into one report.
adk-unit-design
Writes an as-built architecture document for one ADK code unit — purpose, execution flow, data flow, cross-class dependencies, extension points, and the parts that must not change — to docs/design/{topic}/{unit}/index.md. It describes the code as implemented, not a proposed design, and its reader is a developer about…
artifact-deploy
One-click deploy a user's pre-built app/artifact into their OWN AWS account and get a global public HTTPS link (Vercel-like), with a default TTL and promote-to-persistent. Use when the user says "deploy this", "ship this demo", "give me a public link", "share this externally", or "deploy to AWS".
explain-for
Explain a topic, a piece of code, an error, or a design decision calibrated to one named audience — a 5-year-old, a 5th grader, a manager, a designer, a graduate student, a parent. Resolves who the explanation is for (from the request, or from what memory already records about that person), establishes the ground…
web-verify
Look at your OWN front-end change before claiming it works -- navigate the loopback URL of a dev server or pod you started, screenshot the surface you changed, read the image to judge it, and embed it in chat. Three capture backends: playwright-cli (the session the dashboard Browser panel shows), the agent-browser CLI…
learn-from-sage
Detection-gap (miss) analysis for Code Review Sage. Learn from shipped fixes, acted-on human comments, and design outcomes to close reviewer blind spots. Inline during review stages a candidate; a human triggers a one-shot AI consolidation into the live ruleset.