Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add monkilabs/opencastle --skill browser-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/monkilabs/opencastleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/monkilabs/opencastle/browser-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/monkilabs/opencastle/browser-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/monkilabs/opencastle/browser-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/monkilabs/opencastle/browser-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/monkilabs/opencastle/browser-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00513 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00205 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00103 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
browser-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Browser Testing with Chrome DevTools MCP
Project test app, selectors, suites, and breakpoints: .opencastle/stack/testing-config.md. Docs: https://developer.chrome.com/docs/devtools
Context budget — the main constraint
Screenshots are expensive. MAX 3 per session, reserved for evidence: a failure, a bug before and after its fix, a layout at its breakpoints. Assert everything else with evaluate_script — element counts, window.location.href, !!document.querySelector(...), textContent, new URL(location.href).searchParams.toString(). take_snapshot (DOM) is far lighter than take_screenshot. One focus area per session; clear browser state between unrelated flows.
Tools
navigate_page—{ type: 'url', url }or{ type: 'reload' }click/fill/wait_for—clickandfilltake auidfrom a prior snapshot, not a CSS selectorevaluate_script—{ function: '() => ...' }(an arrow function string, not a raw expression)resize_page—{ width, height }list_console_messagesperformance_start_trace—{ reload: true, autoStop: true }; thenperformance_analyze_insight({ insightSetId, insightName })
wait_for timing out almost always means the dev server is down or the URL is wrong — check that before debugging selectors.
Workflow
Navigate → wait_for anchor text → assert via evaluate_script → exercise interactions → hit an edge case URL (e.g. ?q=nonexistent) and assert the empty state → list_console_messages (any error: fix source, rebuild, reload, restart from navigate) → re-run at every breakpoint, verifying interactions and not just layout. Most layout bugs only appear at narrow viewports.
Regression re-test
Build + lint, then re-run the entire previous suite — a fix routinely regresses a different test. Every test must pass before reporting the result in the session output. Do not stop on partial green.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · -2 lines · -28 tokens per session 94e4abcfea1a
- 12d ago First seen · 34 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 9445b07cb7c1
browser-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository monkilabs/opencastle (80 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 513 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
webapp-testing
Web application testing principles. E2E, Playwright, deep audit strategies.
browse
Drive a real browser through Aside: open a page, read it, click through a flow, take screenshots, check console errors. (gstack).
create-verification-skill
Create a repo-local verification skill and exhaustive feature map for driving a real app through its UI, CLI, or API. Use for "create a verification skill", "make a verify skill for this repo", or "document how agents can verify this app".
browser-qa
A browser-based quality check for deployed web pages and user flows. It uses browser automation to test rendering, navigation, forms, interactions, responsive behaviour, and accessibility-related issues.
test-electron-app
Drive the real running PostHog Electron app (live tRPC, workspace-server, real data) over CDP with agent-browser. Connect to the running app on port 9222, test desktop changes against a local Django stack, snapshot the accessibility tree, inspect network requests, and screenshot only when explicitly asked. Use when…
smoke-test
Run smoke tests against a deployed or local app based on your git diff. Each test uses Skyvern browser tools (navigate, act, validate, screenshot) with Chrome DevTools MCP as fallback. Posts screenshot evidence as PR comments.