Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add moonlight-lupin/agent-skills --skill fact-checkergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/moonlight-lupin/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/moonlight-lupin/agent-skills/fact-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/moonlight-lupin/agent-skills/fact-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/moonlight-lupin/agent-skills/fact-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/moonlight-lupin/agent-skills/fact-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/moonlight-lupin/agent-skills/fact-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.02765 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01383 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00553 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00277 |
Grade A, and why
fact-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 243 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fact Checker
Overview
Fact Checker is a targeted verification workflow for one factual assertion at a time. It exists because agents often produce claims that sound plausible but may be hallucinated, copied from a weak source, contradicted by later data, or stale after new reporting. A normal research pass can gather useful background while still failing to answer the narrow question: is this specific claim supported, contradicted, outdated, or not verifiable from available sources?
Use this skill to turn a claim into structured search queries, collect confirming and contradicting passages from multiple independent sources, assess source independence and recency, then produce a concise verification report with citations and a calibrated verdict.
Quick Start
From this skill directory:
python scripts/verify.py structure --claim "Singapore's GDP grew 4.1% in 2025"
Or use the compatibility shortcut:
python scripts/verify.py --claim "Singapore's GDP grew 4.1% in 2025"
After collecting source passages with a web search tool and web extraction tool, generate a report:
python scripts/verify.py report \
--claim claim.json \
--sources sources.json \
--output verification-report.md
Completion criterion: the report states a verdict, lists every cited source, surfaces contradictions if present, and includes a source-independence note.
When to Use
- Verify a single factual claim before publishing, sending, or relying on it.
- Check whether a statistic, event, relationship, quote, or date is supported by sources.
- Cross-check an agent-written paragraph by verifying its highest-impact claims one by one.
- Audit a cited claim for source independence and recency.
When NOT to Use
- Broad topic research or literature review → use a deep research workflow.
- Full entity background dossiers → use an entity research workflow.
- Citation database management → use a source tracking workflow.
- Propaganda, bias, or intent analysis → this skill only verifies factual support.
- Real-time market, weather, emergency, legal, medical, or regulatory determinations → use authoritative live systems and human review.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 243 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 1574782672b0
fact-checker is a skill published in the GitHub repository moonlight-lupin/agent-skills (62 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,765 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
SoloFlow
A meta-skill that silently watches your workflows and automatically generates reusable Hermes skills from them.
hermes-tweet
Use Xquik in Hermes Agent for public X research, monitoring, thread summaries, creator discovery & approved actions. Not affiliated with X Corp. Use when the user requests X data or a named action. Trigger with "search X", "monitor X", "post tweet", or "X trends".
image
Create or optimize marketing images, social graphics, product mockups, banners, cover art, listing visuals, brand assets, image prompts, WebP files, and OG images.
video
Plan and produce video with available AI tools or programmatic frameworks. Use for video prompts, avatars, explainers, demos, templates, pipelines, and generation.
content-research-writer
Research, outline, draft, cite, and revise articles, reports, tutorials, newsletters, and case studies with traceable sources and preserved voice.
content-analysis
Analyze articles, documents, videos, podcasts, and transcripts for arguments, evidence, themes, assumptions, contradictions, insights, and unanswered questions.