content-performance-audit

content-performance-audit is a skill for Claude Code from Mora-AI-Content-Studio/mora-claude-plugin. It costs 89 tokens per session (1,101 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A content-performance review workflow for Mora, a platform for planning and managing social-media posts. It combines post history with engagement data to produce a short brief.

In plain words
What is it for?
It compares top-performing posts with drafts, scheduled posts, publishing volume, posting frequency, and platform patterns.
Why use it?
It turns raw post lists and metrics into a clear view of what has worked and what to do next.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the mora plugin — 6 skills, 1 MCP server shipped together

Good fit It compares top-performing posts with drafts, scheduled posts, publishing volume, posting frequency, and platform patterns.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mora-ai-content-studio/mora-claude-plugin/content-performance-audit
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Mora-AI-Content-Studio/mora-claude-plugin --skill content-performance-audit
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mora-AI-Content-Studio/mora-claude-plugin

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install mora, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for content-performance-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mora-ai-content-studio/mora-claude-plugin/content-performance-audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mora-ai-content-studio/mora-claude-plugin/content-performance-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mora-ai-content-studio/mora-claude-plugin/content-performance-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mora-ai-content-studio/mora-claude-plugin/content-performance-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for content-performance-audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mora-ai-content-studio/mora-claude-plugin/content-performance-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mora-ai-content-studio/mora-claude-plugin/content-performance-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 89 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,101 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00089 $0.01101
Opus 5 $0.00044 $0.00550
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00220
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00110

Measured 8d ago against content hash 766a5ec36b97, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

content-performance-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/content-performance-audit/SKILL.md · 79 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Content Performance Audit

Turn Mora's raw post history and engagement data into a short, actionable brief instead of a data dump. A user asking "how is my content doing" wants a verdict and a next move, not two JSON blobs pasted back at them.

Scope

Ground any "what to post next" answer in this account's actual history rather than generic social media advice — that is the whole point of this skill over just writing from best practice.

Procedure

  1. Call get_post_performance first (default limit is fine unless the user asks for a longer history) to get this account's best-performing published posts ranked by summed engagement (likes + comments + shares + saves).
  2. Call list_posts to see the fuller picture — drafts, scheduled, and recently published posts across all statuses. This surfaces volume and cadence that get_post_performance alone cannot, since it only returns published posts with metrics.
  3. Cross-reference the two. Do not report them as two separate lists — synthesize:
    • Platform pattern: which platform(s) the top performers cluster on, and whether that matches where most volume (list_posts) is actually going. A platform getting the most posts but not the top performers is a signal worth naming.
    • Content theme: read the content field of the top performers for a shared subject, format, or hook — do not invent a theme that isn't visibly there.
    • Timing/cadence: use published_at / scheduled_at / created_at to note posting frequency and whether performance clusters around specific days or a specific run of posts.
    • Status mix: flag if a large share of list_posts is stuck in draft or failed — that is itself a finding, not just performance context.
  4. Produce a short brief with this shape, not a longer one:
    • What's working — 2-4 bullets, each citing a specific post or pattern, never a vague generality like "engaging content performs well."
    • What to do next — 1-3 concrete, specific suggestions tied directly to the evidence above (e.g. "post more on the platform/format that's already outperforming," not generic social media advice).
    • Caveats — anything the data can't support yet (see below).

Read the full file on GitHub · 79 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 79 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A 766a5ec36b97

Subscribe to this mod's changes

content-performance-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Mora-AI-Content-Studio/mora-claude-plugin (0 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 1,101 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens