Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add morodomi/tdd-skills --skill flutter-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/morodomi/tdd-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/morodomi/tdd-skills/flutter-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/morodomi/tdd-skills/flutter-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/morodomi/tdd-skills/flutter-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/morodomi/tdd-skills/flutter-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/morodomi/tdd-skills/flutter-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00410 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00205 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
flutter-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Flutter Quality Check
Flutter/Dart プロジェクトの品質チェックツール。
Commands
| ツール | コマンド | 用途 |
|---|---|---|
| Analyze | dart analyze |
静的解析 |
| Format | dart format . |
フォーマット |
| Test | flutter test |
テスト実行 |
| Coverage | flutter test --coverage |
カバレッジ |
Usage
静的解析
# 基本
dart analyze
# 特定ディレクトリ
dart analyze lib/
# 厳格モード（fatal-infos）
dart analyze --fatal-infos
コードフォーマット
# チェック
dart format --output=none --set-exit-if-changed .
# 自動修正
dart format .
# 特定ディレクトリ
dart format lib/ test/
テスト実行
# 基本
flutter test
# 特定ファイル
flutter test test/widget_test.dart
# カバレッジ付き
flutter test --coverage
# レポート生成
genhtml coverage/lcov.info -o coverage/html
パッケージ管理
# 依存関係取得
flutter pub get
# 依存関係更新
flutter pub upgrade
# outdated確認
flutter pub outdated
Quality Standards
| 項目 | 目標 |
|---|---|
| Analyze | issues 0 |
| Format | エラー0 |
| カバレッジ | 90%+ |
Reference
- 詳細:
reference.md
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 88 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 39a79bfea406
flutter-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository morodomi/tdd-skills (8 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 410 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
android_ui_verification
Automated end-to-end UI testing and verification on an Android Emulator using ADB.
solopi-ai
A command-line framework for testing Android apps and devices with SoloPi, including on-device or cloud AI decision models. It manages devices, test cases, recorded interactions, replays, performance history, and evidence.
agent-device
Automates Apple-platform apps (iOS, tvOS, macOS), Android devices, and Amazon Vega OS TV apps in Vega Virtual Devices. Use when navigating apps, taking snapshots/screenshots where supported, driving TV remotes, tapping, typing, scrolling, extracting UI info, collecting evidence, or planning agent-device CLI commands.
ios-simulator
Verify and debug native, React Native, Expo, or Flutter apps on an iOS Simulator with agent-device. Use when an agent needs to launch an app, inspect its live UI, tap, type, scroll, validate a code change, collect failure evidence, or reproduce a workflow on an iPhone or iPad Simulator.
dogfood
Systematically explore and test a mobile app on iOS/Android with agent-device to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to dogfood, QA, exploratory test, find issues, bug hunt, or test this app on mobile.
eas-simulator
EAS service (paid). Run and control a user's app on a remote iOS/Android simulator hosted on EAS cloud. Read before running any eas simulator: commands - it has the current syntax for this experimental API. Use whenever the user needs a simulator they can't run locally - 'run my app on a cloud simulator', 'use eas…