openspec-update-change

A workflow for revising OpenSpec change documents, which describe planned software changes, so they remain consistent.

In plain words
What is it for?
It revises an existing change's plan and related OpenSpec records, using the correct local store when needed.
Why use it?
It helps update planning documents after decisions change without accidentally editing the code.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/moshcoder/moshcoding/openspec-update-change
Any agent
npx skills add moshcoder/moshcoding --skill openspec-update-change
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/moshcoder/moshcoding

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 55 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,307 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 70% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00055 $0.01307
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.00654
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00261
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00131

Measured yesterday against content hash 82a51ed50b10, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

openspec-update-change scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

70% identical to openspec-update-change — 38 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/skills/openspec-update-change/SKILL.md · 87 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Revise a change's existing planning artifacts and keep them coherent. Never edit code.

Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.

Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.

Steps

  1. If no change name provided, prompt for selection

    Run openspec list --json to get available changes sorted by most recently modified. Then use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select which change to update.

    Present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:

    • Change name
    • Schema (from schema field if present, otherwise "spec-driven")
    • Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
    • How recently it was modified (from lastModified field)

    Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to update.

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change. Always let the user choose.

  2. Get the change's artifacts

    openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    

    Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:

    • schemaName: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
    • artifacts: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "ready", "blocked")
    • isComplete: Boolean indicating if all artifacts are complete
    • planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.

    The artifact ids and paths come from the active schema - do NOT assume them, and do NOT branch on hardcoded artifact names. Custom schemas must work unchanged.

    The files to edit are artifactPaths.<id>.existingOutputPaths - the concrete files that exist on disk, already glob-expanded for glob artifacts (e.g. specs/**/*.md). Do NOT write to resolvedOutputPath: for a glob artifact it is still the glob pattern, not a real file.

  3. Understand the request

    • If the user asked for a specific revision ("the design now uses X"), that is the starting edit.
    • If they only said "update" / "make this coherent", treat it as a coherence review: read the existing artifacts and check them against each other for contradictions, gaps, and duplication.
  4. Read and reconcile

    • Read the artifact(s) the request touches and the change's other existing artifacts.
    • Apply the requested edit. Then check every other existing artifact against it - in ANY direction: an edit to a later artifact may require revising an earlier one, not only the other way around. Build order is a useful reading order, not a constraint on which artifacts may be revised.
    • Note everything that is now inconsistent, missing, or contradictory.
    • Revise only files that already exist (existingOutputPaths). Do NOT create artifacts that don't exist yet, and do NOT invent new files under a glob artifact - note them and point the user to /opsx:continue to create them.
    • If the change is already coherent, say so and make no edits.
  5. Confirm and apply, one artifact at a time

    • Show each proposed revision and why. Write only after the user confirms.
    • If the user rejects a revision, do not write it - leave that artifact unchanged.
    • When a substantial rewrite is needed, get that artifact's rules and template first:
      openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
      

Read the full file on GitHub · 87 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 87 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 82a51ed50b10

Subscribe to this mod's changes

openspec-update-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository moshcoder/moshcoding (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,307 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 70% identical to openspec-update-change, differing in 38 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens