Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add motlin/claude-code-plugins --skill test-assertionsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/motlin/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/motlin/claude-code-plugins/test-assertions)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/motlin/claude-code-plugins/test-assertions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/motlin/claude-code-plugins/test-assertions/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/motlin/claude-code-plugins/test-assertions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/motlin/claude-code-plugins/test-assertions.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01535 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00614 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00307 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
test-assertions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Strict Test Assertions
Capture a value's complete structure in one strict deep-equality check instead of a cluster of narrow checks. When rewriting existing tests, rethink each test as a whole rather than tweaking individual lines, and collapse weak assertions about the same value into one strict check against the complete expected value.
Select the scope
- Use the file or directory named by the user when provided.
- Otherwise, use test files in staged and unstaged changes when the working tree contains changes.
- Otherwise, use all test files in the repository.
Do not change snapshot assertions (toMatchSnapshot) unless the user explicitly includes them.
Prefer the strongest assertion
Use the strictest deep-equality matcher the framework offers for structured values (in Jest, toStrictEqual). Ranked from worst to best, in Jest and Chai terms; only the last is good enough:
toBeTruthy,toBeDefined,not.toBeNull: barely checks anythingtoHaveProperty('key'): only checks existence, not valuetoContain,toMatch: substring/regex match hides the full valuetoHaveLength(n): only checks count, not contentstoMatchObject,objectContaining,arrayContaining: allows extra properties to sneak intoEqual,to.deep.equal: close, but ignores class mismatches and undefined vs missingtoStrictEqual: the only acceptable assertion for objects and arrays
Migrate existing toEqual and to.deep.equal assertions to toStrictEqual too. Use exact equality for primitives (in Jest, toBe is fine for strings, numbers, booleans, null). Tighten calls and exceptions to their exact observable contract: the exact arguments, error type, and message.
toThrow()ortoThrow(/partial/)→toThrow(new SpecificError("exact message"))toHaveBeenCalled()→toHaveBeenCalledWith("exact", "args")
Discover expected values from the test
Do not infer an expected value from implementation code. When writing a new assertion or replacing a weak one, start with a deliberately incomplete strict assertion, run the narrowest relevant test, and use the failure output to capture the actual value. Then review that value as the intended contract and rerun the test to confirm it passes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago Changed · -10 lines 56738092ef81
- 1mo ago Changed · +105 lines c4caa5dc5860
- 1mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A e959b361d43d
test-assertions is a skill published in the GitHub repository motlin/claude-code-plugins (20 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,535 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3
Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
dart-test
DART Test: unit tests, integration tests, CI validation, and debugging.
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
mobiai-ios-testing
Use when writing or running tests in an iOS project — unit tests, UI tests, snapshot tests, choosing the right framework.