Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MountainUnicorn/add --skill uxgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MountainUnicorn/addWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mountainunicorn/add/ux)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mountainunicorn/add/ux"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mountainunicorn/add/ux/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mountainunicorn/add/ux"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mountainunicorn/add/ux.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.02081 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00832 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00416 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00208 |
Grade A, and why
ux scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 256 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ADD UX Command v{{VERSION}}
Iterate on UI/UX design for a feature before implementation begins. Produces a signed-off design artifact that gates /add:plan and /add:tdd-cycle. Prevents token burn from building the wrong UI.
Pre-Flight
- Read
.add/config.jsonto understand project context and maturity level - If
spec-fileargument is provided, read it. Otherwise, list specs inspecs/and ask which feature to design - Verify the spec exists and has a UI component (Q8 answered, or acceptance criteria mention UI states)
- If no UI component is detectable, confirm with the human: "This spec doesn't appear to have a UI — do you still want to run a UX iteration?"
- Check if a UI artifact already exists at
specs/ux/{feature-slug}-ux.md- If it does, and it's marked
Status: APPROVED, ask: "This feature already has a signed-off design. Start over or review the existing one?"
- If it does, and it's marked
Phase 1: Design Source
Determine where the design will come from.
Step 1: Check for Figma MCP
Attempt to detect whether a Figma MCP tool is available in the current session.
If --figma argument was provided OR Figma MCP is available:
Figma integration detected.
Options:
A) Provide a Figma file URL or frame ID to start from an existing design
B) Skip Figma and generate wireframes from scratch
If the human provides a Figma link:
- Use the Figma MCP to read the frame(s)
- Summarize what was found: screen names, key components, flow structure
- Note: Figma MCP is read-only — changes happen in conversation, not in Figma itself
- Proceed to Phase 2 with the Figma content as the starting point
If no Figma MCP and no --figma argument:
- Skip Figma detection silently
- Proceed directly to wireframe generation in Phase 2
Phase 2: UX Iteration Loop
This phase is a conversation loop. Repeat until the human approves the design or explicitly exits.
Step 1: Understand the UI Requirements
Before generating anything, ask focused questions to understand what needs to be designed. Keep it tight — 3-5 questions max.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 256 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 0bfa1b65df46
ux is a skill published in the GitHub repository MountainUnicorn/add (11 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,081 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
ux compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uxMountainUnicorn/add | Skill | 11 | 13d ago | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| bmad-uxbmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD | Skill | 55k | yesterday | none | A | 54 | Claude Code, Codex |
| bmad-agent-ux-designerbmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD | Skill | 55k | yesterday | none | A | 28 | Claude Code, Codex |
| methodology-curatorathola/claude-night-market | Skill | 350 | yesterday | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| taiyi-ui-designDong90/oh-my-taiyiforge | Skill | 855 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code, Codex |
| previewjongwony/epistemic-protocols | Skill | 176 | yesterday | MIT | A | 66 | Claude Code |
| sketchjongwony/epistemic-protocols | Skill | 176 | yesterday | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |