defense-in-depth

defense-in-depth is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp. It costs 35 tokens per session (859 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of Defense-in-Depth Validation, MIT.

A software-development approach that checks input at every layer it passes through. Each boundary, business rule, environment, and diagnostic path can reject or record invalid data.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when invalid data causes failures deep inside an application and the fix should protect API entry points, business logic, environment-specific paths, and debugging.
Why use it?
It prevents a bug from returning through another code path after a single validation check has been bypassed or forgotten.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it when invalid data causes failures deep inside an application and the fix should protect API entry points, business logic, environment-specific paths, and debugging.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp/defense-in-depth
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp --skill defense-in-depth
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for defense-in-depth

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp/defense-in-depth/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp/defense-in-depth)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp/defense-in-depth"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp/defense-in-depth/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for defense-in-depth

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp/defense-in-depth"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp/defense-in-depth.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 35 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 859 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 89% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00035 $0.00859
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00430
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00172
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00086

Measured 9d ago against content hash 7f4f533e6c37, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

defense-in-depth scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

89% identical to Defense-in-Depth Validation — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

assets/skills/defense-in-depth/SKILL.md · 128 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Defense-in-Depth Validation

Overview

When you fix a bug caused by invalid data, adding validation at one place feels sufficient. But that single check can be bypassed by different code paths, refactoring, or mocks.

Core principle: Validate at EVERY layer data passes through. Make the bug structurally impossible.

Why Multiple Layers

Single validation: "We fixed the bug" Multiple layers: "We made the bug impossible"

Different layers catch different cases:

  • Entry validation catches most bugs
  • Business logic catches edge cases
  • Environment guards prevent context-specific dangers
  • Debug logging helps when other layers fail

The Four Layers

Layer 1: Entry Point Validation

Purpose: Reject obviously invalid input at API boundary

function createProject(name: string, workingDirectory: string) {
  if (!workingDirectory || workingDirectory.trim() === '') {
    throw new Error('workingDirectory cannot be empty');
  }
  if (!existsSync(workingDirectory)) {
    throw new Error(`workingDirectory does not exist: ${workingDirectory}`);
  }
  if (!statSync(workingDirectory).isDirectory()) {
    throw new Error(`workingDirectory is not a directory: ${workingDirectory}`);
  }
  // ... proceed
}

Layer 2: Business Logic Validation

Purpose: Ensure data makes sense for this operation

function initializeWorkspace(projectDir: string, sessionId: string) {
  if (!projectDir) {
    throw new Error('projectDir required for workspace initialization');
  }
  // ... proceed
}

Layer 3: Environment Guards

Purpose: Prevent dangerous operations in specific contexts

async function gitInit(directory: string) {
  // In tests, refuse git init outside temp directories
  if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test') {
    const normalized = normalize(resolve(directory));
    const tmpDir = normalize(resolve(tmpdir()));

    if (!normalized.startsWith(tmpDir)) {
      throw new Error(
        `Refusing git init outside temp dir during tests: ${directory}`
      );
    }
  }
  // ... proceed
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 128 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 128 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 7f4f533e6c37

Subscribe to this mod's changes

defense-in-depth is a skill published in the GitHub repository movebrickschi/harness-engineering-mcp (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 859 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to Defense-in-Depth Validation, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

debug-optimize-lcp

Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…

ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp · 99 tokens

systematic-debugging

Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.

open-metadata/OpenMetadata · 37 tokens

diagnose

Trace from a reproduced symptom to the source code that causes it. Pin the specific file and approximate line, rate confidence in the cause and clarity of the fix independently, and always propose a concrete fix.

emdash-cms/emdash · 43 tokens

repro-admin

Reproduce an EmDash admin UI bug. Attach a container, start the demo dev server, drive the admin with agent-browser using the dev-bypass session, and capture the reproduction as screenshots plus a replayable transcript.

emdash-cms/emdash · 48 tokens

log-error-digest

Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…

zebbern/claude-code-guide · 71 tokens

byted-util-volcengine-detect-retry

An orchestration workflow for Volcengine Cloud Detect, a service that checks websites or network endpoints from test locations.

bytedance/agentkit-samples · 101 tokens