Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/implement-slice-complementnpx skills add Mozurok/fhorja.dev --skill implement-slice-complementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mozurok/fhorja.devWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00205 | $0.06036 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00102 | $0.03018 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00041 | $0.01207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00604 |
Grade A, and why
implement-slice-complement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Output contract, in brief. This body is over the per-skill re-injection cap, so after a compaction the sections below are truncated away while this summary survives. They remain authoritative in full; re-read this file before emitting if you need them.
Standard output layout (required): Produce the command output using this structure (English only):Artifact changes: Follow## Global output contractinWORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdforAPPLIED/PROPOSED/SKIPrules.Command transcript: Brief audit trail (max 4 lines; max 3 in no-op runs withNO_OP_TRACE).Handoff: Use the adaptive ending format fromWORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md## Global output contract(Mode A compact or Mode B full per...Definition of done (command output): Every micro-delta bullet is addressed or explicitly deferred with evidence.
Act as a senior engineer applying a small, explicit follow-up to work that already belongs to a slice (or was completed under one), without treating the change as a new slice or reopening full slice planning.
Goal:
Execute a bounded micro-delta (adjustments, fixes, polish, missed checklist items) that stays inside the same slice intent and DECISIONS.md, then record evidence in slice notes and/or TASK_STATE.md routing without churning unrelated artifacts.
This is the typical successor for authoring the test files test-strategy.md names (a mechanical translation of already-locked behavior into test code, no new design work) when test-strategy.md itself stops short of writing them. When the named test scenarios require new design decisions instead, use another implement-approved-slice round.
Mandatory context bootstrap (before any output):
- Read these sections in
WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdfirst:## LLM execution contract## Editor mode policy(mode definitions only; the tool mapping table is lazy-loaded inwos/editor-mode-mappings.mdand needed only for non-Claude-Code tools)## Global output contract(including Adaptive handoff and Mode selection rule)## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails
- Bootstrap tiers (ADR-0025): the light-weight commands (
branch-commit,what-next,where-we-at,slice-closure,compact-task-memory) may skip## Editor mode policygood-fits lists and## Cross-cutting workflow guardrailssequencing heuristics, reading only the mode definitions and the core guardrail rules (routing memory, command-less input triage, official command names, material change, no-op). The full tier is measured at 10530 tokens: the combined size of the four always-readWORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdsections listed above. That figure is asserted here in prose and no gate recomputes it, so it drifts every time the spec grows: it was declared at 9610 and measured at 10530 on 2026-08-10, a 9.6 per cent gap, and it will drift again unless re-measured with the same method (sum the four^##sections, chars over 4). The reduced tier is a self-declared estimate of about 3,500 tokens for the trimmed subset above; it has not been independently re-measured by the same method, and should be read as an estimate rather than a fresh figure. The same reduced tier extends to the high-frequency execution commandsimplement-approved-sliceandsync-task-state(v3 wave1 item D: the most-invoked commands pay the bootstrap most often;state-reconciledeliberately stays on the full tier, cross-artifact judgment needs the full guardrail context). - Cache-amortized layer (ADR-0006): this bootstrap floor was DESIGNED as a cache-amortized cost rather than a per-command tax. ADR-0139 measured that the amortization is real but NOT controllable from here: the harness manages caching itself, there is no per-file or per-segment caching, and a command body is injected as a user message after the cached prefix. Whether this floor is cached is a property of the host, not of anything this repository can mark. Treat the figure below as a real per-invocation cost when reasoning about what a command carries. It sits in the prompt cache for the session and is paid at write cost once per cache TTL window, then at roughly 0.1x on cached reads inside that window. Account for it separately from any per-skill Load budget (the generated
.claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.mdbody); the two are different layers and should not be summed into one figure. - Session bootstrap reuse (skip-if-unchanged; v3 wave1 item D): WHEN this same conversation already performed this bootstrap read in an earlier turn that is still VISIBLE in the current context window AND
WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdhas not changed since, the command MAY skip the re-read and cite the earlier one instead, emitting one Command transcript line:Bootstrap: reusing turn <N> read, WOS unchanged. This is a scoped exception to the context-budget re-fetch rule (wos/context-budget.md, "The re-fetch rule"), justified because the bootstrap sections are one large, static, byte-identical read repeated every turn rather than a variable tool result; the re-fetch rule still governs every other tool result without exception. VISIBLE means the bootstrap section text itself is still present and quotable in the window right now, not merely that the record of an earlier read exists. On a harness that clears, a tool result can be emptied while the record that the tool ran survives (ADR-0114); a command that finds only that record, without the section text still readable, has not satisfied VISIBLE and must re-read. Self-declared memory after a compaction never qualifies (re-read instead), and a stateless-per-turn harness is excluded. The auditable-skip rule applies: the transcript line is mandatory; a silent skip is invalid output. - Resolving a relative
wos/<topic>.md. Try the canonical workflow repository root FIRST, then the installed docs directory (~/.claude/workflow-docs/wos/or~/.cursor/workflow-docs/wos/). Name the root you resolved against in### Command transcript, and say so explicitly when NEITHER resolved rather than continuing silently: several of these loads are declared MANDATORY, and a lazy load that resolved nowhere is otherwise indistinguishable in the output from one that was never needed. Repository first, because the installed copy is a snapshot that no sync prunes: preferring it would make an edit towos/invisible to every command until someone re-ran the installer. - Read additional sections only when relevant to this command's role.
- Read the
commands/directory command inventory to ensure command names and availability are current. - Align all routing recommendations and next-command suggestions with the current command set.
- Official next-command names only: every recommended next command (including the handoff
Run nowline) MUST be the basename of an existingcommands/<name>.mdfile in this workflow repository. Never invent names. One exception:Run now: nonewithMode: N/Adeclares that the chain has ended and no following command would be honest, defined in## Global output contract(ADR-0126); use it only when nothing honest remains, never to end a chain that has a real next step.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 161 lines · 205 tokens per session scan A 74d634f9b863
implement-slice-complement is a skill published in the GitHub repository Mozurok/fhorja.dev (6 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 205 tokens to every session and 6,036 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
chinese-documentation
中文文档排版参考——中英文空格、全半角标点、术语保留、链接格式、中文文案排版指北约定。仅在用户显式 /chinese-documentation 时调用,不要根据上下文自动触发。.
workflow-start
Primary entry point for the spec-superflow state-machine workflow. Invoke when the user is inside an active spec-superflow change directory (look for .spec-superflow.yaml, changes/ /, proposal.md, specs/, design.md, tasks.md, or execution-contract.md) and asks to start, continue, resume, implement, plan, or figure out…
release-archivist
Close out a spec-superflow change with verification, summary, and archive readiness. Invoke when implementation is complete, verification is underway, or the user asks for a final wrap-up.
contract-builder
Convert approved planning artifacts into an execution contract. Invoke when the user wants to start building, asks to move from planning to implementation, or when execution-contract.md is missing or stale.
need-explorer
Clarify intent, scope, constraints, and success criteria before artifact creation. Invoke when the request is fuzzy, the user is comparing options, or the workflow needs a stable change definition before writing artifacts.
memorix-troubleshooting
Use when Memorix MCP, setup, project binding, HTTP control plane, hooks, skills, or agent integration is missing, stale, or failing.