Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Mozurok/fhorja.dev --skill incident-triagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mozurok/fhorja.devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/incident-triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/incident-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/incident-triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/incident-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/incident-triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00128 | $0.06167 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00051 | $0.02467 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.01233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00617 |
Grade A, and why
incident-triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 156 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Output contract, in brief. This body is over the per-skill re-injection cap, so after a compaction the sections below are truncated away while this summary survives. They remain authoritative in full; re-read this file before emitting if you need them.
Standard output layout (required): Produce the command output using this structure (English only):Artifact changes: List files in the task repository that would change, orNone.Command transcript: Keep this section operational and brief; do not restate file content already listed in### Artifact changes.Handoff: Use the adaptive ending format ofWORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md## Global output contract. Every Handoff is one fencedtextb...Definition of done (command output): Failure classification is exactly one ofREGRESSION/NEW_BUG/CONFIG/EXTERNAL_DEPENDENCY/REPRODUCIBILITY/ `DIAGNO...
Act as a senior/staff engineering incident triage lead for the active engineering task.
Goal: Triage a concrete observed technical failure (stack trace, error output, failing test, runtime symptom, or production alert), classify the failure type, recommend the smallest decisive next step, and decide whether the fix needs the full task workflow or fits as a hotfix without ceremony. The command exists so urgent failures do not bypass the workflow entirely; instead, it provides a fast structured triage that routes either to a hotfix-shaped path or to a slice/investigation path depending on real evidence.
Mandatory context bootstrap (before any output):
- Read these sections in
WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdfirst:## LLM execution contract## Editor mode policy(mode definitions only; the tool mapping table is lazy-loaded inwos/editor-mode-mappings.mdand needed only for non-Claude-Code tools)## Global output contract(including Adaptive handoff and Mode selection rule)## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails
- Bootstrap tiers: the light-weight commands (
branch-commit,what-next,where-we-at,slice-closure,compact-task-memory) plus the high-frequencyimplement-approved-sliceandsync-task-state(v3 wave1 item D) read the four sections above with two subsections of## Cross-cutting workflow guardrailsskipped:### External web access (centralized)and### Sequencing heuristics (by phase). Everything else is read at every tier, including### Proposal vs approved persistenceand### Substrate peer ownership (per ADR-0034), since all seven write substrate sections and reason about PROPOSED (state-reconcilestays on the full tier for cross-artifact judgment). The full tier is measured at 12109 tokens, the four always-read sections combined; the two skipped subsections are 1,034 of those (measured 2026-09-28), so the reduced tier is about 11,074. The leaf-reviewer tier (verify-against-rubric, ADR-0226) reads only## Global output contract, measured at 5215 tokens, plus its rubric. - Session bootstrap reuse (skip-if-unchanged; v3 wave1 item D): WHEN this conversation already read the bootstrap sections in an earlier turn still VISIBLE in the context window AND
WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdhas not changed since, the command MAY skip the re-read and cite the earlier one, emitting one Command transcript line:Bootstrap: reusing turn <N> read, WOS unchanged. Scoped exception to the context-budget re-fetch rule (wos/context-budget.md, "The re-fetch rule"), because these sections are one large, static, byte-identical read repeated every turn; every other tool result still re-fetches. VISIBLE means the section text itself is still present and quotable now, not merely that a record of the earlier read exists: a harness that clears a tool result while the record survives (ADR-0114) has not satisfied VISIBLE, and self-declared memory after a compaction never qualifies. A stateless-per-turn harness is excluded. The transcript line is mandatory; a silent skip is invalid output. - Resolving the spec and
wos/<topic>.md: canonical repository FIRST. Otherwise use active-adapter docs:~/.claude/workflow-docs(CLAUDE_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR),~/.cursor/workflow-docs(WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR; project.cursor/workflow-docson project installs),~/.codex/workflow-docs(CODEX_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR), or<kimi-home>/workflow-docs(KIMI_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR). Nonempty overrides win. Kimi home:KIMI_CODE_HOME, else existing~/.kimi-code, else existing~/.kimi, default~/.kimi-code. Use one root for both paths; try other adapters if absent or unknown. Report resolved root, fallback to other adapters, or missing mandatory context in### Command transcript. Installed snapshots refresh and prune retired topics only on sync. - Read additional sections only when relevant to this command's role.
- Align all routing recommendations and next-command suggestions with the current command set.
- Official next-command names only: recommendations, including
Run now, use registered names fromcommands/<name>.mdorcommands/<name>/SKILL.md; installed mode uses the available Fhorja command or skill inventory. No invented aliases.Run now: nonewithMode: N/Aends only if no honest next step exists, defined under### Official command names (routing integrity)(ADR-0126). Required inputs: - active task folder path
- TASK_STATE.md (current phase and state of the task this incident belongs to)
- optional:
DECISIONS.md,INVARIANTS_AND_NON_GOALS.md, and the projectREFERENCES.md(the read-comments gate checks it for a captured upstream thread). The validation in Required output 5 reads these; a run without them returnsnot applicablethere rather than asserting compatibility. - the failure signal, exactly one of (paste verbatim):
- stack trace from runtime, test runner, or log
- error output (HTTP error body, CLI stderr, build log excerpt)
- failing test name plus assertion message and the relevant test file path
- runtime symptom with explicit repro steps (commands or actions that reproduce the failure)
- expected behavior in 1 to 2 lines (what should have happened)
- environment context, exactly one of:
local,ci,staging,prod - urgency tag, exactly one of:
BLOCKING_PROD,BLOCKING_CI,BLOCKING_PEER,NONE. WHEN a<task>/SLO_SPEC.mdexists (fromslo-define), a breached or rapidly-burning error budget on a user-facing flow raises the urgency tag (an SLO breach on a user-facing SLI maps toBLOCKING_PROD). - recent change context if regression is suspected: last commit, last deploy, last config change, with timestamp or SHA when available
- relevant code or config paths if known
- last completed step from TASK_STATE.md (command and summary)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed · -85 tokens per session 89b0d7670bc2
- 18d ago Changed · -1 lines 395e25cc7815
- 25d ago Changed · -1 lines 19868fe470e8
- 26d ago Changed · -14 lines b0740c165c14
- 1mo ago First seen · 172 lines · 213 tokens per session scan A 2076fa9b4d7a
incident-triage is a skill published in the GitHub repository Mozurok/fhorja.dev (10 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 128 tokens to every session and 6,167 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
A step-by-step method for finding the underlying cause of technical problems before changing code. It covers reading errors, reproducing failures, checking recent changes, and tracing data across system components.
kiro-debug
Investigate implementation failures using root-cause-first debugging. Use when an implementer is blocked, verification fails, or repeated remediation does not converge.
kiro-verify-completion
Verify completion and success claims with fresh evidence. Use before claiming a task is complete, a fix works, tests pass, or a feature is ready for GO.
systemic-issue-triage
Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.
issue-root-resolution
Trigger: root audit, atacar la raíz, issue roots, backlog roots, mechanism map, deletion-driven fix, resolver issues de raíz, close outdated issues. Audit and resolve issue clusters by verified root cause.
rdd-defect-workflow
Trigger: RDD, receipt-driven development, review authority, receipt/lineage, correction/recovery, delivery gate/kill switch, bounded review defects. Guide work.