Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Mozurok/fhorja.dev --skill project-bootstrapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mozurok/fhorja.devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/project-bootstrap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/project-bootstrap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/project-bootstrap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/project-bootstrap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/project-bootstrap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00181 | $0.03906 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00090 | $0.01953 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00781 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00391 |
Grade A, and why
project-bootstrap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 234 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Act as a senior/staff engineering project initializer.
Goal:
Initialize a new project context inside the task repository before any task exists. Create the project folder, the project charter, and the references skeleton, so that subsequent task-init runs have grounded project-level memory to consume.
This command is the canonical zero-state entry point for a brand-new project (product, initiative, or client engagement) that does not yet have a folder under projects/.
Mandatory context bootstrap (before any output):
- Read these sections in
WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdfirst:## LLM execution contract## Editor mode policy## Global output contract(including Adaptive handoff and Mode selection rule)## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails## Project-level memory
- Read additional sections only when needed:
- naming/path setup:
## Naming conventions,## Repository structure - multi-repo schema:
## Multi-repo support (v1) - phase/entry ambiguity:
## Command rolesindex (orwos/command-roles.mdfor full per-command detail),## Entry points
- naming/path setup:
- Read the
commands/directory command inventory to ensure command names and availability are current. - Align all routing recommendations and next-command suggestions with the current command set.
- Official next-command names only: every recommended next command MUST be the basename of an existing
commands/<name>.mdfile in this workflow repository. Never invent names. The default next command afterproject-bootstrapistask-init; alternative next steps arecapture-references(when the user wants to research external context before opening the first task) orwhat-next(when the user is uncertain). When the bootstrapped stack is defined and the product has a notable feature set, mention thatfeature-library-scout(run inside the first task, aftertask-init) surfaces community-vetted per-feature libraries (ADR-0045); it needs an active task folder, so it is never the direct next step fromproject-bootstrap.
Required inputs:
- initial product description / objective from the user
- client and project identifier (or enough context to derive
<client>__<project>) - intended editor mode (Ask for drafting only, or Agent for actual file creation in
my_work_tasks) - optional but encouraged: stack (or explicit
[not decided yet]), planned repositories, known references (URLs, docs, tickets), constraints, non-goals, stakeholders
Adaptive question flow (loop control):
- This command MUST ask only the minimum questions needed to fill the required fields below; everything else stays as
[to be confirmed]or[not decided yet]in the artifacts. - Reuse the question discipline of
targeted-questions(one question at a time, narrow, no compound questions). - The question loop ENDS as soon as all of these are answered (each may be answered with
[not decided yet]by the user):- client + project identifier
- product objective (one paragraph)
- stack (or explicit
[not decided yet]) - planned repositories (0, 1, or N; if N is at least 2, capture the multi-repo schema upfront)
- known references (URLs/docs/tickets) or explicit "none yet"
- constraints and non-goals known so far, or explicit "none yet"
- Do NOT ask speculative or design questions (architecture choices, naming standards, backlog items, etc.). The command is for context capture, not for solving.
- Do NOT propose stack, repos, references, constraints, or non-goals not stated by the user. Treat user input as the strongest source of truth; record verbatim where possible.
- No human respondent (unattended, background, or fleet-dispatched run, per ADR-0044 doctrine): do NOT self-answer and do NOT lock anything. Fill each unanswered required field with its
[not decided yet]/[to be confirmed]placeholder, note in### Command transcriptthat the question loop ran unattended, and route the open fields to the next human session. Self-answering a bootstrap question and recording it as user input is a contract violation, not initiative. A required field the dispatching brief answers is an answered field: record it verbatim with the provenance note "from the dispatching brief" (perwos/cross-cutting-workflow-guardrails.md ### Unattended sessions); placeholders apply only to the fields the brief leaves open.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 234 lines · 181 tokens per session scan A 59e682b91cf7
project-bootstrap is a skill published in the GitHub repository Mozurok/fhorja.dev (6 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 181 tokens to every session and 3,906 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
issue-creation
Trigger: issue creation, bug reports, feature requests, or issue approval. Create and triage GitHub issues from repository evidence.
sdd-tasks
Break an SDD change into implementation tasks. Trigger: orchestrator launches task planning for a change.
systemic-issue-triage
Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.
ijfw-workflow
Use when the user says: 'build', 'create', 'plan', 'new project', 'brainstorm', 'design', 'UI', 'website', 'dashboard', 'app', 'help me build', 'launch', 'book', 'campaign', or anything project-level. Skill body decides Quick vs Deep path.
ijfw-plan
Use when the user says 'plan this', 'plan it', 'make a plan', 'let's plan', 'draft a plan', 'how should we tackle this', 'break this down', or invokes '/ijfw-plan'. Produces a falsifiable PLAN.md (software, book, campaign, design, research) with task breakdown, dependency wave-table, and success criteria — gated by…
ijfw-milestone-summary
Use when the user asks for a milestone summary, milestone recap, or to summarize a milestone -- or runs /ijfw-milestone-summary. Trigger: 'milestone summary', 'summarize milestone', 'milestone recap', 'onboard someone to this release', 'what shipped in v ', invoked by ijfw-complete-milestone.