repo-consistency-sweep

repo-consistency-sweep is a skill for Claude Code from Mozurok/fhorja.dev. It costs 96 tokens per session (7,073 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A codebase consistency checker that looks for recurring defects such as convention drift, ordering mistakes, weak type safety, and security gaps.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for auditing a task's code changes and producing ranked findings with confidence and suggested fixes.
Why use it?
It catches routine problems so reviewers can spend more time on design, intent, and shared understanding.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions subagents; reads ~/.codex paths.

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is bash scripts/verify-substrate-batch.sh <active-task-folder>.

Good fit It is for auditing a task's code changes and producing ranked findings with confidence and suggested fixes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mozurok/fhorja.dev
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for repo-consistency-sweep

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for repo-consistency-sweep

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 96 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 7,073 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00096 $0.07073
Opus 5.5 $0.00038 $0.02829
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00019 $0.01415
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00707

Measured 18d ago against content hash 0e4469009078, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

repo-consistency-sweep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 18d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/repo-consistency-sweep/SKILL.md · 162 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 162 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Output contract, in brief. This body is over the per-skill re-injection cap, so after a compaction the sections below are truncated away while this summary survives. They remain authoritative in full; re-read this file before emitting if you need them.

  • Standard output layout (required): Produce the command output using this structure (English only):
  • Artifact changes: Follow ## Global output contract in WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md for APPLIED / PROPOSED / SKIP rules. Every listed file...
  • Command transcript: Brief audit trail (max 4 lines; max 3 in no-op runs with NO_OP_TRACE).
  • Handoff: Use the adaptive ending format of WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md ## Global output contract. Every Handoff is one fenced text b...
  • Definition of done (command output): Diff was computed and hashed; no-op returned if unchanged.

Act as a meticulous senior engineer performing a proactive codebase-consistency sweep on the current task diff.

Goal: Detect convention drift, ordering bugs, type-safety gaps, and other patterned defect classes on the current diff against a curated bug-class library. Produce a triageable list of findings with severity, confidence, and suggested fix. Return no-op when the sweep would not surface new findings.

Mandatory context bootstrap (before any output):

  • Read these sections in WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md first:
    • ## LLM execution contract
    • ## Editor mode policy (mode definitions only; the tool mapping table is lazy-loaded in wos/editor-mode-mappings.md and needed only for non-Claude-Code tools)
    • ## Global output contract (including Adaptive handoff and Mode selection rule)
    • ## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails
  • Bootstrap tiers: the light-weight commands (branch-commit, what-next, where-we-at, slice-closure, compact-task-memory) plus the high-frequency implement-approved-slice and sync-task-state (v3 wave1 item D) read the four sections above with two subsections of ## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails skipped: ### External web access (centralized) and ### Sequencing heuristics (by phase). Everything else is read at every tier, including ### Proposal vs approved persistence and ### Substrate peer ownership (per ADR-0034), since all seven write substrate sections and reason about PROPOSED (state-reconcile stays on the full tier for cross-artifact judgment). The full tier is measured at 12109 tokens, the four always-read sections combined; the two skipped subsections are 1,034 of those (measured 2026-09-28), so the reduced tier is about 11,074. The leaf-reviewer tier (verify-against-rubric, ADR-0226) reads only ## Global output contract, measured at 5215 tokens, plus its rubric.
  • Session bootstrap reuse (skip-if-unchanged; v3 wave1 item D): WHEN this conversation already read the bootstrap sections in an earlier turn still VISIBLE in the context window AND WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md has not changed since, the command MAY skip the re-read and cite the earlier one, emitting one Command transcript line: Bootstrap: reusing turn <N> read, WOS unchanged. Scoped exception to the context-budget re-fetch rule (wos/context-budget.md, "The re-fetch rule"), because these sections are one large, static, byte-identical read repeated every turn; every other tool result still re-fetches. VISIBLE means the section text itself is still present and quotable now, not merely that a record of the earlier read exists: a harness that clears a tool result while the record survives (ADR-0114) has not satisfied VISIBLE, and self-declared memory after a compaction never qualifies. A stateless-per-turn harness is excluded. The transcript line is mandatory; a silent skip is invalid output.
  • Resolving the spec and wos/<topic>.md: canonical repository FIRST. Otherwise use active-adapter docs: ~/.claude/workflow-docs (CLAUDE_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR), ~/.cursor/workflow-docs (WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR; project .cursor/workflow-docs on project installs), ~/.codex/workflow-docs (CODEX_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR), or <kimi-home>/workflow-docs (KIMI_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR). Nonempty overrides win. Kimi home: KIMI_CODE_HOME, else existing ~/.kimi-code, else existing ~/.kimi, default ~/.kimi-code. Use one root for both paths; try other adapters if absent or unknown. Report resolved root, fallback to other adapters, or missing mandatory context in ### Command transcript. Installed snapshots refresh and prune retired topics only on sync.
  • Read additional sections only when relevant to this command's role.
  • Align all routing recommendations and next-command suggestions with the current command set.
  • Official next-command names only: recommendations, including Run now, use registered names from commands/<name>.md or commands/<name>/SKILL.md; installed mode uses the available Fhorja command or skill inventory. No invented aliases. Run now: none with Mode: N/A ends only if no honest next step exists, defined under ### Official command names (routing integrity) (ADR-0126). Required inputs:
  • active task folder path
  • TASK_STATE.md (to know the current slice and diff context)
  • SOURCE_OF_TRUTH.md (to know the base branch for diff computation)
  • DECISIONS.md (to ground analysis in approved decisions)
  • IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md (to know which slice is current and what files are in scope)
  • optional: REVIEW_PREFERENCES.md (if present, used for suppression of previously declined findings)
  • optional: active/<task>/.wos/VERIFICATION_LOG.jsonl (if present, validated by scripts/verify-log-validator.py per K.5 wiring; missing log is VALID for legacy tasks predating K.1)
  • optional: scripts/verify-log-validator.py (invoked for the K.5 audit; informational when missing)
  • optional: scripts/scan-substrate-orphans.py (invoked for the K.7 substrate-orphan audit; informational when missing)

Read the full file on GitHub · 162 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 18d ago Changed · -61 tokens per session 0e4469009078
  2. 21d ago Changed · -1 lines d573b158fe71
  3. 28d ago Changed · +1 lines be5a8cd7e458
  4. 29d ago Changed · -19 lines · -43 tokens per session dc33e91fc4a0
  5. 1mo ago First seen · 181 lines · 200 tokens per session scan A cfb5823b61b3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

repo-consistency-sweep is a skill published in the GitHub repository Mozurok/fhorja.dev (10 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 7,073 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systemic-issue-triage

Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 57 tokens

issue-root-resolution

Trigger: root audit, atacar la raíz, issue roots, backlog roots, mechanism map, deletion-driven fix, resolver issues de raíz, close outdated issues. Audit and resolve issue clusters by verified root cause.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 45 tokens

rdd-defect-workflow

Trigger: RDD, receipt-driven development, review authority, receipt/lineage, correction/recovery, delivery gate/kill switch, bounded review defects. Guide work.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 41 tokens

incident-response

Incident management lifecycle — triage, communicate, mitigate, postmortem. Three modes — new (start incident), update (status update), postmortem (blameless RCA report).

drafthq/draft · 41 tokens

review-diff

Scan git diffs for project-specific anti-patterns. Triggers on: 'scan diff', 'check diff', 'anti-pattern check', 'pattern scan', 'review changes'.

faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint · 40 tokens

discover

Primary router for discovery, debugging, investigation, quality, and exploration workflows. Analyzes user intent and dispatches to debug, bughunt, quick-review, deep-review, coverage, testing-strategy, learn, tour, impact, assist-review. The recommended entry point for any 'find out', 'check', 'review', or…

drafthq/draft · 75 tokens