repo-consistency-sweep

repo-consistency-sweep is a skill for Claude Code from Mozurok/fhorja.dev. It costs 200 tokens per session (7,154 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A codebase consistency checker that looks for recurring defects such as convention drift, ordering mistakes, weak type safety, and security gaps.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for auditing a task's code changes and producing ranked findings with confidence and suggested fixes.
Why use it?
It catches routine problems so reviewers can spend more time on design, intent, and shared understanding.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions subagents.

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is bash scripts/verify-substrate-batch.sh <active-task-folder>.

Good fit It is for auditing a task's code changes and producing ranked findings with confidence and suggested fixes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mozurok/fhorja.dev
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for repo-consistency-sweep

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for repo-consistency-sweep

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/repo-consistency-sweep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 200 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 7,154 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00200 $0.07154
Opus 5 $0.00100 $0.03577
Sonnet 5 $0.00040 $0.01431
Haiku 4.5 $0.00020 $0.00715

Measured 7d ago against content hash cfb5823b61b3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

repo-consistency-sweep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/repo-consistency-sweep/SKILL.md · 181 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 181 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Output contract, in brief. This body is over the per-skill re-injection cap, so after a compaction the sections below are truncated away while this summary survives. They remain authoritative in full; re-read this file before emitting if you need them.

  • Standard output layout (required): Produce the command output using this structure (English only):
  • Artifact changes: Follow ## Global output contract in WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md for APPLIED / PROPOSED / SKIP rules.
  • Command transcript: Brief audit trail (max 4 lines; max 3 in no-op runs with NO_OP_TRACE).
  • Handoff: Use the adaptive ending format from WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md ## Global output contract (Mode A compact or Mode B full per...
  • Definition of done (command output): Diff was computed and hashed; no-op returned if unchanged.

Act as a meticulous senior engineer performing a proactive codebase-consistency sweep on the current task diff.

Goal: Detect convention drift, ordering bugs, type-safety gaps, and other patterned defect classes on the current diff against a curated bug-class library. Produce a triageable list of findings with severity, confidence, and suggested fix. Return no-op when the sweep would not surface new findings.

Mandatory context bootstrap (before any output):

  • Read these sections in WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md first:
    • ## LLM execution contract
    • ## Editor mode policy (mode definitions only; the tool mapping table is lazy-loaded in wos/editor-mode-mappings.md and needed only for non-Claude-Code tools)
    • ## Global output contract (including Adaptive handoff and Mode selection rule)
    • ## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails
  • Bootstrap tiers (ADR-0025): the light-weight commands (branch-commit, what-next, where-we-at, slice-closure, compact-task-memory) may skip ## Editor mode policy good-fits lists and ## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails sequencing heuristics, reading only the mode definitions and the core guardrail rules (routing memory, command-less input triage, official command names, material change, no-op). The full tier is measured at 10530 tokens: the combined size of the four always-read WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md sections listed above. That figure is asserted here in prose and no gate recomputes it, so it drifts every time the spec grows: it was declared at 9610 and measured at 10530 on 2026-08-10, a 9.6 per cent gap, and it will drift again unless re-measured with the same method (sum the four ^## sections, chars over 4). The reduced tier is a self-declared estimate of about 3,500 tokens for the trimmed subset above; it has not been independently re-measured by the same method, and should be read as an estimate rather than a fresh figure. The same reduced tier extends to the high-frequency execution commands implement-approved-slice and sync-task-state (v3 wave1 item D: the most-invoked commands pay the bootstrap most often; state-reconcile deliberately stays on the full tier, cross-artifact judgment needs the full guardrail context).
  • Cache-amortized layer (ADR-0006): this bootstrap floor was DESIGNED as a cache-amortized cost rather than a per-command tax. ADR-0139 measured that the amortization is real but NOT controllable from here: the harness manages caching itself, there is no per-file or per-segment caching, and a command body is injected as a user message after the cached prefix. Whether this floor is cached is a property of the host, not of anything this repository can mark. Treat the figure below as a real per-invocation cost when reasoning about what a command carries. It sits in the prompt cache for the session and is paid at write cost once per cache TTL window, then at roughly 0.1x on cached reads inside that window. Account for it separately from any per-skill Load budget (the generated .claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.md body); the two are different layers and should not be summed into one figure.
  • Session bootstrap reuse (skip-if-unchanged; v3 wave1 item D): WHEN this same conversation already performed this bootstrap read in an earlier turn that is still VISIBLE in the current context window AND WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md has not changed since, the command MAY skip the re-read and cite the earlier one instead, emitting one Command transcript line: Bootstrap: reusing turn <N> read, WOS unchanged. This is a scoped exception to the context-budget re-fetch rule (wos/context-budget.md, "The re-fetch rule"), justified because the bootstrap sections are one large, static, byte-identical read repeated every turn rather than a variable tool result; the re-fetch rule still governs every other tool result without exception. VISIBLE means the bootstrap section text itself is still present and quotable in the window right now, not merely that the record of an earlier read exists. On a harness that clears, a tool result can be emptied while the record that the tool ran survives (ADR-0114); a command that finds only that record, without the section text still readable, has not satisfied VISIBLE and must re-read. Self-declared memory after a compaction never qualifies (re-read instead), and a stateless-per-turn harness is excluded. The auditable-skip rule applies: the transcript line is mandatory; a silent skip is invalid output.
  • Resolving a relative wos/<topic>.md. Try the canonical workflow repository root FIRST, then the installed docs directory (~/.claude/workflow-docs/wos/ or ~/.cursor/workflow-docs/wos/). Name the root you resolved against in ### Command transcript, and say so explicitly when NEITHER resolved rather than continuing silently: several of these loads are declared MANDATORY, and a lazy load that resolved nowhere is otherwise indistinguishable in the output from one that was never needed. Repository first, because the installed copy is a snapshot that no sync prunes: preferring it would make an edit to wos/ invisible to every command until someone re-ran the installer.
  • Read additional sections only when relevant to this command's role.
  • Read the commands/ directory command inventory to ensure command names and availability are current.
  • Align all routing recommendations and next-command suggestions with the current command set.
  • Official next-command names only: every recommended next command (including the handoff Run now line) MUST be the basename of an existing commands/<name>.md file in this workflow repository. Never invent names. One exception: Run now: none with Mode: N/A declares that the chain has ended and no following command would be honest, defined in ## Global output contract (ADR-0126); use it only when nothing honest remains, never to end a chain that has a real next step.

Read the full file on GitHub · 181 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 181 lines · 200 tokens per session scan A cfb5823b61b3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

repo-consistency-sweep is a skill published in the GitHub repository Mozurok/fhorja.dev (6 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 200 tokens to every session and 7,154 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systemic-issue-triage

Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 57 tokens

issue-root-resolution

Trigger: root audit, atacar la raíz, issue roots, backlog roots, mechanism map, deletion-driven fix, resolver issues de raíz, close outdated issues. Audit and resolve issue clusters by verified root cause.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 45 tokens

rdd-defect-workflow

Trigger: RDD, receipt-driven development, review authority, receipt/lineage, correction/recovery, delivery gate/kill switch, bounded review defects. Guide work.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 41 tokens

sdd-apply

Skill "sdd-apply" from Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai, covering execution role, language domain contract, purpose, what you receive and execution and persistence contract.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 0 tokens

gentle-ai-collab-perfect

Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the…

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 106 tokens

issue-creation

Trigger: issue creation, bug reports, feature requests, or issue approval. Create and triage GitHub issues from repository evidence.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 30 tokens