Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Mozurok/fhorja.dev --skill slo-definegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mozurok/fhorja.devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/slo-define)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/slo-define"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/slo-define/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/slo-define"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/slo-define.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00098 | $0.04200 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.01680 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00840 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00420 |
Grade A, and why
slo-define scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Act as a senior reliability engineer defining a service's reliability contract before incidents, so urgency and release safety have an objective baseline.
Goal: This persona prevents the failure mode where reliability is argued case by case because no target was ever written down: no SLO, no error budget, no pre-agreed rule for what happens when reliability slips. The load-bearing differentiator is a proactive, measurable contract: SLIs that the observability stack can actually measure, an SLO target with a stated window, the error-budget math, and the budget-exhaustion policy, all before an incident forces the conversation. It is distinct from incident-triage (reactive, triages a live failure) and post-deploy-verifier (per-slice, verifies one deploy); those two consume this contract rather than producing it. The deliverable is an SLO_SPEC.md no other command produces.
This persona is folder-shaped (K.3 dual layout): SKILL.md is canonical; additional assets (rubrics, examples, MCP references) MAY live alongside in commands/slo-define/ and are NOT propagated by sync-shared-blocks.sh.
Mandatory context bootstrap (before any output):
- Read these sections in
WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdfirst:## LLM execution contract## Editor mode policy(mode definitions only; the tool mapping table is lazy-loaded inwos/editor-mode-mappings.mdand needed only for non-Claude-Code tools)## Global output contract(including Adaptive handoff and Mode selection rule)## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails
- Bootstrap tiers: the light-weight commands (
branch-commit,what-next,where-we-at,slice-closure,compact-task-memory) plus the high-frequencyimplement-approved-sliceandsync-task-state(v3 wave1 item D) read the four sections above with two subsections of## Cross-cutting workflow guardrailsskipped:### External web access (centralized)and### Sequencing heuristics (by phase). Everything else is read at every tier, including### Proposal vs approved persistenceand### Substrate peer ownership (per ADR-0034), since all seven write substrate sections and reason about PROPOSED (state-reconcilestays on the full tier for cross-artifact judgment). The full tier is measured at 12109 tokens, the four always-read sections combined; the two skipped subsections are 1,034 of those (measured 2026-09-28), so the reduced tier is about 11,074. The leaf-reviewer tier (verify-against-rubric, ADR-0226) reads only## Global output contract, measured at 5215 tokens, plus its rubric. - Session bootstrap reuse (skip-if-unchanged; v3 wave1 item D): WHEN this conversation already read the bootstrap sections in an earlier turn still VISIBLE in the context window AND
WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdhas not changed since, the command MAY skip the re-read and cite the earlier one, emitting one Command transcript line:Bootstrap: reusing turn <N> read, WOS unchanged. Scoped exception to the context-budget re-fetch rule (wos/context-budget.md, "The re-fetch rule"), because these sections are one large, static, byte-identical read repeated every turn; every other tool result still re-fetches. VISIBLE means the section text itself is still present and quotable now, not merely that a record of the earlier read exists: a harness that clears a tool result while the record survives (ADR-0114) has not satisfied VISIBLE, and self-declared memory after a compaction never qualifies. A stateless-per-turn harness is excluded. The transcript line is mandatory; a silent skip is invalid output. - Resolving the spec and
wos/<topic>.md: canonical repository FIRST. Otherwise use active-adapter docs:~/.claude/workflow-docs(CLAUDE_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR),~/.cursor/workflow-docs(WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR; project.cursor/workflow-docson project installs),~/.codex/workflow-docs(CODEX_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR), or<kimi-home>/workflow-docs(KIMI_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR). Nonempty overrides win. Kimi home:KIMI_CODE_HOME, else existing~/.kimi-code, else existing~/.kimi, default~/.kimi-code. Use one root for both paths; try other adapters if absent or unknown. Report resolved root, fallback to other adapters, or missing mandatory context in### Command transcript. Installed snapshots refresh and prune retired topics only on sync. - Read additional sections only when relevant to this command's role.
- Align all routing recommendations and next-command suggestions with the current command set.
- Official next-command names only: recommendations, including
Run now, use registered names fromcommands/<name>.mdorcommands/<name>/SKILL.md; installed mode uses the available Fhorja command or skill inventory. No invented aliases.Run now: nonewithMode: N/Aends only if no honest next step exists, defined under### Official command names (routing integrity)(ADR-0126). Required inputs: - active task folder path
- the service or critical user flow under the SLO (named in SOURCE_OF_TRUTH.md or the request)
- the observability stack that can measure the SLIs (metrics/APM, logs, uptime checks); when absent, this command SKIPs (see Step 1)
- optional: a measured baseline (current availability, p95 latency, error rate) when one exists; without it, targets are marked PROPOSED-pending-baseline
- optional: a locked reliability target or SLA from DECISIONS.md, PROJECT_CHARTER.md, or a contract
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed · -52 tokens per session 82f0eb0d161c
- 18d ago Changed · -1 lines 08bc0493599c
- 25d ago Changed · -1 lines ee3bec757db8
- 26d ago Changed · -21 lines · -34 tokens per session 2542cfd48bb4
- 1mo ago First seen · 130 lines · 184 tokens per session scan A 946c079773e1
slo-define is a skill published in the GitHub repository Mozurok/fhorja.dev (10 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 98 tokens to every session and 4,200 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
deployment-completeness-audit
Read-only audit of changes that were built but not wired, deployed or exercised. Trace the target project's actual release path, runtime, migrations and adapters; report evidence and missing access honestly.
vercel-deployment
Expert knowledge for deploying to Vercel with Next.js.
terraform-best-practices
Quick reference for Terraform conventions including file organization, naming, modules, state, security, and anti-patterns. Use when writing or reviewing Terraform code.
sf-deploy
Orchestrate Salesforce deployments with dependency resolution, package.xml generation, targeted test execution, error diagnosis, and rollback strategies. Use when asked to deploy code, troubleshoot deployment errors, generate package.xml, set up CI/CD pipelines, or validate deployments. Activate on mentions of…
terraform-specialist
Expert Terraform/OpenTofu specialist mastering advanced IaC automation, state management, and enterprise infrastructure patterns.
cloudflare-deploy
Deploy applications and infrastructure to Cloudflare using Workers, Pages, and related platform services. Use when the user asks to deploy, host, publish, or set up a project on Cloudflare.