Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mphinance/alpha-skills --skill data-quality-checkergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mphinance/alpha-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mphinance/alpha-skills/data-quality-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mphinance/alpha-skills/data-quality-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mphinance/alpha-skills/data-quality-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mphinance/alpha-skills/data-quality-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mphinance/alpha-skills/data-quality-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.01365 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00546 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00273 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
data-quality-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to data-quality-checker — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 162 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Overview
Detect common data quality issues in market analysis documents before publication. The checker validates five categories: price scale consistency, instrument notation, date/weekday accuracy, allocation totals, and unit usage. All findings are advisory -- they flag potential issues for human review rather than blocking publication.
When to Use
- Before publishing a weekly strategy blog or market analysis report
- After generating automated market summaries
- When reviewing translated documents (English/Japanese) for data accuracy
- When combining data from multiple sources (FRED, FMP, FINVIZ) into one report
- As a pre-flight check for any document containing financial data
Prerequisites
- Python 3.9+
- No external API keys required
- No third-party Python packages required (uses only standard library)
Workflow
Step 1: Receive Input Document
Accept the target markdown file path and optional parameters:
--file: Path to the markdown document to validate (required)--checks: Comma-separated list of checks to run (optional; default: all)--as-of: Reference date for year inference in YYYY-MM-DD format (optional)--output-dir: Directory for report output (optional; default:reports/)
Step 2: Execute Validation Script
Run the data quality checker script:
python3 skills/data-quality-checker/scripts/check_data_quality.py \
--file path/to/document.md \
--output-dir reports/
To run specific checks only:
python3 skills/data-quality-checker/scripts/check_data_quality.py \
--file path/to/document.md \
--checks price_scale,dates,allocations
To provide a reference date for year inference (useful for documents without explicit year in dates):
python3 skills/data-quality-checker/scripts/check_data_quality.py \
--file path/to/document.md \
--as-of 2026-02-28
Step 3: Load Reference Standards
Read the relevant reference documents to contextualize findings:
references/instrument_notation_standard.md-- Standard ticker notation, digit-count hints, and naming conventions for each instrument classreferences/common_data_errors.md-- Catalog of frequently observed errors including FRED data delays, ETF/futures scale confusion, holiday oversights, allocation total pitfalls, and unit confusion patterns
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 162 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A d9473d7f8980
data-quality-checker is a skill published in the GitHub repository mphinance/alpha-skills (28 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,365 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to data-quality-checker, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
orbit-notion
Open Orbit briefing skill — selected by the Orbit pipeline when Notion is the user's only connected connector, or when the user explicitly scopes their daily digest to Notion. Pulls the past 24 hours of document edits, comments, mentions, and database row changes from the user's authenticated Notion connection and…
instrument-data-to-allotrope
Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
baoyu-youtube-transcript
A tool for downloading the written captions, subtitles, chapter information, speaker labels, and cover image from a YouTube video using its URL or ID.
feishu
Work with Feishu or Lark bots, docs, sheets, bitables, approval flows, and OpenAPI/MCP setup without hardcoding credentials.
read
Fetches URLs and PDFs, then summarizes or returns clean Markdown; can also search the web through DeepSeek when built-in search is thin. Use when asked to read, fetch, quote, cite, convert, or save a URL or PDF. Not for local text files already in the repo.