Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mracal/vibe-engineeringnpx agentmods add skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/async-task-queueWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/async-task-queue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/async-task-queue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/async-task-queue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/async-task-queue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/async-task-queue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00602 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00241 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00120 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
vibe-async-task-queue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to vibe-async-task-queue — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
vibe-async-task-queue
Not everything needs to be done right now. But "I'll do it later" only works if "later" actually happens.
When to Use This Skill
- You identify work that should be done but isn't blocking the current task
- During code review, you find issues that aren't urgent
- Tests reveal non-critical flakiness
- Documentation needs updating but not right now
- "TODO" comments that should become tracked tasks
When NOT to Use This Skill
- Blocking work that must be done now
- Tasks already tracked in an issue tracker (GitHub Issues, Jira, etc.)
- One-off tasks in the current session (just do them)
Queue Format
Tasks are stored in a JSON file at a project-specific location (e.g., .claude/task-queue.json):
{
"tasks": [
{
"id": "vibe-001",
"created": "2026-02-28",
"priority": "medium",
"status": "pending",
"description": "Add error handling to parseConfig edge cases",
"target_files": ["internal/config/parser.go"],
"acceptance": "go test ./internal/config/... -run TestParseConfigEdge -v passes",
"context": "Discovered during fuzz testing session"
}
]
}
Steps
Adding a Task
- Identify the work
- Write a clear description with:
- What needs to be done
- Which files are affected
- How to verify it's done (acceptance command)
- Why it was deferred (context)
- Append to queue file
Processing the Queue
- Read queue file
- Pick highest-priority pending task
- Set status to
in_progress - Do the work
- Run acceptance test
- If pass: set status to
completed, commit - If fail: set status to
pending, add notes about what went wrong
Reviewing the Queue
List all tasks with status counts. Identify stale tasks (>7 days pending).
Output Format
Task Queue Status
Pending: X | In Progress: Y | Completed: Z | Failed: W
| ID | Priority | Description | Age | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vibe-001 | high | Add auth token refresh | 2d | pending |
| vibe-002 | medium | Fix flaky test in utils | 5d | pending |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 82 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 1942ed706929
vibe-async-task-queue is a skill published in the GitHub repository mracal/vibe-engineering (3 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 602 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to vibe-async-task-queue, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
todos
Use when the user asks for a shared plan, a task needs at least three substantive execution steps, or a loose TODO is pending. Without an explicit plan request, not for one-shot answers or checks, or one- to two-step work that is not already in the list.
cog-braindump-capture
Capture raw thoughts with automatic domain classification and vault routing.
context-preservation
State capture and restore across context window compactions. Monitors usage thresholds and serializes quality, task, and spec state for seamless continuation.
cog-knowledge-consolidation
Build structured knowledge frameworks from scattered vault notes with source attribution.
cog-onboarding
Personalize COG Second Brain workflow through role pack selection and vault initialization.
cog-weekly-reflection
Cross-domain pattern analysis with personal, professional, and project domain synthesis.