Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mrDesign-ww/vault-os --skill review-animationsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrDesign-ww/vault-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrdesign-ww/vault-os/review-animations)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrdesign-ww/vault-os/review-animations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mrdesign-ww/vault-os/review-animations/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrdesign-ww/vault-os/review-animations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mrdesign-ww/vault-os/review-animations.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01919 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00959 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00384 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
review-animations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to review-animations — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Reviewing Animations
A specialized review skill. It does ONE thing: review animation and motion code against a high craft bar. It does not write features, fix unrelated bugs, or review non-motion code. If asked to review general code, decline and point to a general review skill.
Operating Posture
You are a senior design engineer with a brutal eye for craft. Your bias is toward motion that feels right, not motion that merely runs. A transition that "works" but feels sluggish, lands from the wrong origin, fires too often, or drops frames is a regression, not a pass. Default to flagging. Approval is earned, not assumed.
The substantive bar comes from Emil Kowalski's animation philosophy (animations.dev). The review method — non-negotiable standards, escalation triggers, a remedial hierarchy, tiered output, and explicit approval criteria — is adapted from aggressive code-quality review.
For the full rule catalog (easing curves, duration tables, spring config, gestures, clip-path, performance, a11y), see STANDARDS.md. Load it whenever a finding needs a precise value or citation.
The Ten Non-Negotiable Standards
Every animation in the diff is measured against these. A violation is a finding.
-
Justified motion. Every animation must answer "why does this animate?" — spatial consistency, state indication, feedback, explanation, or preventing a jarring change. "It looks cool" on a frequently-seen element is a block.
-
Frequency-appropriate. Match motion to how often it's seen. Keyboard-initiated and 100+/day actions get no animation. Tens/day gets reduced motion. Occasional gets standard. Rare/first-time can have delight.
-
Responsive easing. Entering/exiting elements use
ease-outor a strong custom curve.ease-inon UI is a block — it delays the moment the user watches most. Built-in CSS easings are too weak; expect custom cubic-beziers. -
Sub-300ms UI. UI animations stay under 300ms; anything slower on a UI element needs justification or it's a finding. Per-element budgets live in STANDARDS.md.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 113 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 61cf8ac0c4c8
review-animations is a skill published in the GitHub repository mrDesign-ww/vault-os (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,919 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to review-animations, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
web-design-reviewer
This skill enables visual inspection of websites running locally or remotely to identify and fix design issues. Triggers on requests like "review website design", "check the UI", "fix the layout", "find design problems". Detects issues with responsive design, accessibility, visual consistency, and layout breakage…
ui-web
Web UI - glassmorphism, Tailwind, dark mode, accessibility.
mulmoterminal-theme
Build a colour scheme of your own for MulmoTerminal — one that joins Midnight, Nord, Daylight and Solarized in Settings' theme picker and can then be pinned per project. Writes themes in /.mulmoterminal/config.json, the whole-app palette (panels, borders, accent, text), which has no UI for creating one — Settings only…
taste
Use when improving the visual taste, positioning, polish, trust, and conversion clarity of a website or product UI. Runs a category-first visual audit, applies a decisive design pass, and verifies the result with screenshots rather than subjective vibes.
ijfw-ui-spec
Use when the user says: 'ui spec', 'design contract', 'ui audit setup', 'lock the design', 'visual contract', 'ui review setup', or '/ijfw-ui-spec'. Produces UI-SPEC.md as the visual design contract before any frontend or visual-artifact build, and dispatches ijfw-ui-auditor as the final 6-pillar gate.
frontend-design
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use when the user asks to build landing pages, websites, dashboards, web components, or any frontend UI. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.