review-documentation

review-documentation is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from mrinalwadhwa/fluent. It costs 38 tokens per session (468 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A guide for checking whether software documentation is complete, accurate, clear, and well organized. It can review changed documentation or audit documentation across a codebase.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review documentation changes, inspect code and its accompanying explanations, and identify missing or misleading documentation.
Why use it?
It helps find missing explanations and documentation that no longer matches the code. It checks documentation at levels ranging from function comments to user-facing pages.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Part of the fluent plugin — 6 skills shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mrinalwadhwa/fluent/review-documentation
Any agent
npx skills add mrinalwadhwa/fluent --skill review-documentation
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrinalwadhwa/fluent

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install fluent, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-documentation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mrinalwadhwa/fluent/review-documentation.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrinalwadhwa/fluent/review-documentation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrinalwadhwa/fluent/review-documentation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mrinalwadhwa/fluent/review-documentation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 38 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 468 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00038 $0.00468
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00234
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00094
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00047

Measured 5d ago against content hash dfcc921d956e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-documentation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skill-migrations/v0.1.4/review-documentation/SKILL.md · 35 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 35 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Purpose

Decide whether the code under review has documentation at every level — function docstrings, file-header comments, module READMEs, codebase-level docs, and user-facing pages. Identify code that lacks documentation, and existing docs that are inaccurate, unclear, or poorly organized.

Scope

The invoking layer decides what's in scope. For a diff-scoped review, that's the code and documentation changed in the diff. For a full-codebase audit, that's the entire codebase and its documentation. Check the documentation for accuracy, writing quality, and vocabulary consistency, and check the code for documentation that should exist but doesn't.

Method

  1. Read the code under review to understand what needs documenting.

  2. Read references/documentation.md for writing-quality standards.

  3. For each in-scope documentation file:

    • Read it alongside the code it describes.
    • Check accuracy against the code.
    • Evaluate writing quality against the standards.
    • Identify improvements.
  4. Check the codebase for undocumented capabilities at every level — function docstrings, file-header comments, module READMEs, codebase-level architecture and contributing docs, and user-facing documentation. Skip when the code speaks for itself; not every function needs a docstring.

  5. Check the documentation set as a whole for vocabulary drift — the same concept named differently across pages, or a doc term that conflicts with what the code, tests, or user-facing surface calls it.

  6. Check the candidate's commit messages over the provided commit range against the project's stated commit-message conventions in AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md. If the project states commit conventions, flag any commit that violates them. If the project states no commit conventions, skip this step — do not impose conventions the project did not state.

  7. For each improvement, decide if it blocks shipping. Inaccurate paths, commands, or workflows that would break a reader's task typically block. Vague phrasing, minor AI tells, and small clarity nits typically don't.

Read the full file on GitHub · 35 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 35 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A dfcc921d956e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-documentation is a skill published in the GitHub repository mrinalwadhwa/fluent (87 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 468 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.