Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/mshadmanrahman/pm-pilot/verification-loopnpx skills add mshadmanrahman/pm-pilot --skill verification-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mshadmanrahman/pm-pilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mshadmanrahman/pm-pilot/verification-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mshadmanrahman/pm-pilot/verification-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mshadmanrahman/pm-pilot/verification-loop.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00633 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00316 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00127 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
verification-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verification Loop
Run all quality gates before committing or creating a PR.
When to Use
- Before any git commit
- Before creating a pull request
- After completing implementation (before marking done)
- When asked to "verify" or "check everything"
Procedure
Step 1: Detect Project Type
Identify available tools from project files:
package.json: npm/yarn scripts (lint, typecheck, test)pyproject.toml/setup.py: Python tooling (ruff, mypy, pytest)go.mod: Go tooling (golangci-lint, go vet, go test)Cargo.toml: Rust tooling (clippy, cargo test)
Step 2: Run Quality Gates
Execute in order (stop on CRITICAL):
| Gate | Command (detect per project) | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Lint | eslint, ruff, golangci-lint | HIGH |
| Type Check | tsc --noEmit, mypy, go vet | HIGH |
| Tests | jest, pytest, go test | CRITICAL |
| Security | npm audit, pip-audit, cargo audit | CRITICAL |
| Coverage | jest --coverage, pytest --cov | HIGH |
Step 3: Report Results
Verification: {project name}
Lint: PASS | FAIL ({count} issues)
Types: PASS | FAIL ({count} errors)
Tests: PASS | FAIL ({pass}/{total})
Security: PASS | FAIL ({count} vulnerabilities)
Coverage: {percent}% (target: 80%)
Verdict: READY TO COMMIT | BLOCKED ({reason})
Step 4: Actionable Fixes
For each failure, provide:
{gate} FAIL:
{file}:{line} - {error message}
Fix: {specific suggestion}
Blocking Rules
- CRITICAL failures block commit (tests failing, known vulnerabilities)
- HIGH failures: warn but allow commit with acknowledgment
- MEDIUM/LOW: report only, do not block
Output Format
Verification: lead-scoring-simulator
Lint: PASS
Types: PASS
Tests: PASS (24/24)
Security: PASS
Coverage: 87% (target: 80%)
Verdict: READY TO COMMIT
Rules
- Always run tests with verbose output
- Kill any hung processes after 120s timeout
- If a gate tool is not installed, skip it with a warning
- Never auto-fix lint issues without showing what changed
- Clean up test artifacts after run
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 96 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 817704b196f5
verification-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository mshadmanrahman/pm-pilot (19 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 633 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
feature-spec
Creates a complete product feature specification with acceptance criteria, scope, dependencies, and risks. Delegates to the Prometeo (PM) agent.
gmgn-dev-score
Decide whether a token creator's NEXT launch is safe to buy. Scores a dev address 0-100 on two separate axes — CONDUCT (will he dump on you at open) and POWER (has he ever actually built anything big) — from his full launch history and every trade he made in his own coins, then returns a buy / don't-buy call with a…
decided-import
Reformat ONE existing document (a decision, requirement, design, roadmap, or prompt) into ONE valid RAC (requirements-as-code) artifact, with a mandatory human-review step before any file is written and decided validate as the deterministic close. Use when a user wants to add or import a single existing decision or…
orch
AI agent orchestrator — manage teams of AI agents that work on your codebase in parallel. Use when the user wants to: run multiple agents, coordinate AI work, deploy agent teams, manage tasks/goals/agents, check orchestrator status, or mentions 'orch', 'orchestry', 'agents team', 'agent orchestration'.
image
Extract text from images using a vision LLM.
pipefy-relations
Use this skill when the user wants to link pipes, tables, or cards across workflows — creating or managing pipe relations, table relations, or card relations. Covers 8 MCP tools.