persuasive-technical-writing

persuasive-technical-writing is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad. It costs 69 tokens per session (1,642 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A writing guide for producing long technical essays, post-mortems, launch stories, and public technical releases. It covers structure, human-sounding rhythm, examples, and mechanical checks on the finished prose.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan and revise persuasive technical articles, incident reviews, launch narratives, and public releases.
Why use it?
It provides a repeatable way to turn technical findings into readable long-form writing without applying the process to short documentation or social posts.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Good fit Use it to plan and revise persuasive technical articles, incident reviews, launch narratives, and public releases.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/persuasive-technical-writing
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad --skill persuasive-technical-writing
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for persuasive-technical-writing

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/persuasive-technical-writing/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/persuasive-technical-writing)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/persuasive-technical-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/persuasive-technical-writing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for persuasive-technical-writing

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/persuasive-technical-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/persuasive-technical-writing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 69 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,642 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00069 $0.01642
Opus 5.5 $0.00028 $0.00657
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00328
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00164

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 32ab28e10e25, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

persuasive-technical-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/persuasive-technical-writing/SKILL.md · 66 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Persuasive Technical Writing

Turn raw technical findings into human-sounding, high-retention long-form prose. The rules below are ordered by impact against six failure symptoms; each priority names the symptom it fixes, so jump to your problem. Every rule is mechanically checkable: where a rule states a number, that number is the test a reviewer or a later pass runs with a grep or a count.

How to use

Run two passes, never one. Pass 1 builds structure and argument: Priority 2 (cohesion), Priority 3 (section titles), Priority 5 (analogies). Pass 2 is a mechanical prose linter over the countable rules: Priority 1 (cadence and blacklist), Priority 4 (quotes), Priority 6 (bolding and hook). Do not lint before the argument holds, and do not ship before the lint passes.

Priority 1: Human cadence and anti-AI rhythm (fixes "does not sound human")

  • Rule 1.1 (Gary Provost burstiness rule): Never write three consecutive sentences of similar length (within ±3 words). In every 200-word block, enforce at least one short punch sentence (<7 words) and at least one rhythmic compound sentence (>25 words).
  • Rule 1.2 (hard lexical blacklist): Strictly ban the Kobak et al. excess words. Zero instances permitted. Grep the draft for each token:
    delve, tapestry, testament, beacon, pivotal, intricate, realm, underscores,
    harnessing, multifaceted, interplay, moreover, furthermore, in conclusion, at its core
    
  • Rule 1.3 (de-symmetrization): Ban symmetrical parallelism (not only X, but also Y; from X to Y and beyond). Break formulaic 3-part bullet lists into continuous narrative paragraphs.
  • Rule 1.4 (Williams character-action rule): Express characters as grammatical subjects and core actions as active verbs. Ban empty openings (There is, There are, It is important that) and strip nominalizations ending in -tion, -ment, -ance.

Priority 2: Cohesion and information pacing (fixes "hard to stay with")

  • Rule 2.1 (Williams given-before-new): The first 6-8 words of every sentence must connect semantically to a concept established in the immediate prior sentence. Place novel, complex, or heavy technical terms strictly at the end of the sentence (the stress position).
  • Rule 2.2 (mobile paragraph ceiling): On mobile and X viewports, cap paragraphs at 1-3 sentences (maximum 40-60 words). Never stack two 3-sentence paragraphs; alternate with 1-sentence pivot paragraphs.
  • Rule 2.3 (Minto problem-first flow): Introduce technical solutions only after establishing the Situation and Complication. Maintain forward causal momentum; every paragraph must answer the question raised by the preceding one.

Read the full file on GitHub · 66 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 32ab28e10e25

Subscribe to this mod's changes

persuasive-technical-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad (165 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 1,642 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-20.