claude-vibe-squad: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/technical-seo-audit/SKILL.md

technical-seo-audit is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad. It costs 66 tokens per session (236 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A technical check of whether a website can be crawled, indexed, and understood by search engines. It examines the site’s instructions, page metadata, structure, links, and structured data.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect robots rules, meta tags, canonical URLs, sitemaps, response status, headings, internal links, and structured data.
Why use it?
It helps find technical reasons search engines may miss pages, choose the wrong page, or misunderstand what a page is about, without inventing traffic or ranking results.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on claude-vibe-squad itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything claude-vibe-squad configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/main/.agents/skills/technical-seo-audit/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for technical-seo-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/technical-seo-audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/technical-seo-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/technical-seo-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/technical-seo-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for technical-seo-audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/technical-seo-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad/technical-seo-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 66 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 236 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00066 $0.00236
Opus 5 $0.00033 $0.00118
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00047
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00024

Measured 10d ago against content hash 31a82cf7696c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

technical-seo-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/technical-seo-audit/SKILL.md · 22 lines

What it actually says

Technical SEO Audit

Audit a page/site for search discoverability by mechanism — crawl, index, intent — without inventing metrics.

Steps

  1. Check indexability: robots/meta directives, canonical tags, sitemap presence, HTTP status.
  2. Audit on-page technical SEO: titles, meta descriptions, heading hierarchy, internal linking.
  3. Validate structured data (see structured-data-authoring).
  4. Record source date, locale, and device assumptions for every finding.
  5. Write each recommendation with the mechanism it moves (crawl/index/intent); mark anything requiring live analytics as "measure after connector."

Acceptance

  • Every recommendation names the mechanism it affects.
  • Structured data is validated.
  • No fabricated rankings/traffic; measurement gaps are explicitly deferred to a connector.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 22 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 31a82cf7696c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

technical-seo-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad (142 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 236 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.