Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mthines/agent-skills --skill pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mthines/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mthines/agent-skills/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mthines/agent-skills/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mthines/agent-skills/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mthines/agent-skills/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mthines/agent-skills/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.03902 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.01561 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00780 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00390 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 247 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/pr-review — one-shot read-only PR review
Dispatch the pr-reviewer agent at a PR and report what came back.
It never applies a finding, never pushes, and never resolves a thread.
Why each choice below exists: references/design-rationale.md.
Contents
- Operations
- Before Step 0: on a Dash0 Agent0 host
- Step 0: Parse the argument · Step 1: Resolve the PR
- Step 2: Dispatch the agent · Worker preamble · When sub-agent dispatch is unavailable
- Step 3: Report
- Locating the support tree
- Hard rules
Operations
Parse the first token of $ARGUMENTS.
| First token | Operation | Runs |
|---|---|---|
remember |
memory write — read rules/remember.md |
one mcp__lorekit__memory_write, no review |
| anything else (or empty) | review | one pr-reviewer dispatch, read-only |
No mode turns this command into an apply pass; a request to fix findings is review-loop or /implement-suggestion (which command). Inside review-loop, --no-feedback is this command's report-only counterpart.
Before Step 0: on a Dash0 Agent0 host
Agent0 cannot dispatch the custom pr-reviewer type, and its import can hold this SKILL.md alone.
Settle this before Step 0 and before any dispatch, by file presence and never from a failed dispatch.
It governs the review operation; remember dispatches nothing and resolves its tree on its own.
- Prepared —
/tmp/workspace/agent-skills/env.shexists. Source it (. /tmp/workspace/agent-skills/env.sh) in every Bash call; it exportsAGENT_SUPPORT,AGENT_SKILLS_ROOT, andAGENT_SKILLS_COMMIT. Read linked files from the install, never from the imported folder: this skill'srules/andreferences/from$AGENT_SKILLS_ROOT/skills/pr-review/, a sibling skill from$AGENT_SKILLS_ROOT/skills/<name>/, and everyagents/<path>link from$AGENT_SKILLS_ROOT/<path>. When$AGENT_SKILLS_ROOT/skills/pr-review/SKILL.mddiffers from the copy you are running, or you cannot compare them, follow the installed copy: the installed copy at$AGENT_SKILLS_COMMITwins, because the files it links come from that commit. Then make the dispatch substitutions in$AGENT_SKILLS_ROOT/shared/rules/agent0-host.md:pr-reviewerbecomes ageneralsub-agent that reads$AGENT_SKILLS_ROOT/pr-reviewer.agent0.md, and the intent worker's type isgeneral. - Unprepared — no
env.sh, but/tmp/workspace,/tmp/.opencode/skills/, or/tmp/.opencode/agents/general.mdexists. This skill does not install. Stop with/pr-review — skipped (Agent0 sandbox not prepared; run /review-loop <PR> --no-feedback, which installs on demand and reviews once). After that install,/pr-reviewtakes the prepared branch. - Neither — not Agent0. Continue with Step 0.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -167 lines · -22 tokens per session dfb1a1e9c7f6
- 8d ago Changed · +17 lines e09bc9cdc4f7
- 10d ago Changed 6d3f38ad9821
- 25d ago Changed · -1 lines 941b27da1ae1
- 28d ago Changed · +120 lines 24aa45cf6a09
- 1mo ago Changed · +10 lines 9fe06fb06d47
- 1mo ago First seen · 268 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A 76b7bc0ed49c
pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository mthines/agent-skills (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 3,902 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
antfu-create-pr
Create a reviewable GitHub pull request from the current branch with a Conventional Commits title, a concise evidence-based body, and before/after screenshots for UI changes. Use when asked to open, create, publish, or prepare a PR.
git-workflow
Git best practices, branching strategies, commit conventions, and code review patterns.
create-pr
Create pull requests following Sentry conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Follows Sentry's code review guidelines.
codex-review
Professional code review with auto CHANGELOG generation, integrated with Codex AI.
azure-repos
Expert knowledge for Azure Repos development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, and integrations & coding patterns. Use when managing Git/TFVC repos, branch policies/PR checks, CodeQL/secret scanning, ELM sync, or…
gitlab-api
Fetches and analyzes GitLab merge request (MR) comments, metadata, and review feedback using authenticated API calls. Capabilities include fetching comment threads, retrieving reviewer feedback, filtering unresolved discussions, and generating MR activity reports. Use when the user asks about GitLab MR comments, code…