review-changes

review-changes is a skill for Claude Code from mthines/agent-skills. It costs 65 tokens per session (1,428 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command for reviewing changes in a Git branch or GitHub pull request, including code quality, tests, documentation, and commit history.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to perform a one-time review or guide a pull request through review, fixes, replies to comments, and final simplification.
Why use it?
It gathers review concerns in one process and can either report them or route the work through a bounded fix-and-review cycle.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter.

Part of the mthines-agent-skills plugin — 54 skills, 4 agents shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mthines/agent-skills/review-changes
Any agent
npx skills add mthines/agent-skills --skill review-changes
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mthines/agent-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install mthines-agent-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 54 skills, 4 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-changes

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mthines/agent-skills/review-changes.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mthines/agent-skills/review-changes)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mthines/agent-skills/review-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mthines/agent-skills/review-changes.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 65 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,428 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00065 $0.01428
Opus 5 $0.00032 $0.00714
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00286
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00143

Measured 6d ago against content hash 70f4be55381a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-changes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/quality/review-changes/SKILL.md · 94 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Routing

Choose the path based on the argument shape:

Argument shape Path Reason
no arg / --report Skill("review-loop", "<pr-url> [--critical|--no-ci|--external-review|--interval S]") on the current branch's open PR, or pr-reviewer directly if --report (one-shot, no apply) Own PR convergence loop, or one-shot report.
PR URL or #<n> Skill("review-loop", "<pr-url> [--critical|--no-ci|--external-review|--interval S]") — runs the bounded review-apply-simplify loop Converges the PR regardless of who authored it (pr-reviewer detects REVIEW_RELATION itself).

--no-ci, --external-review and --interval S are pass-throughs: this skill never sets them itself, it only forwards what the user passed (see the note below).

# --report routes straight to pr-reviewer, which --external-review exists to avoid.
# Refuse the pair rather than accepting a flag this path cannot honour, mirroring
# review-loop's refusal of --no-feedback --external-review.
case "$ARGUMENTS" in
  *--report*) case "$ARGUMENTS" in
    *--external-review*)
      echo "--report needs pr-reviewer; drop --external-review or drop --report."
      exit 1 ;;
  esac ;;
esac

# Resolve the current branch's PR whenever no PR was named. Test for the ABSENCE of a
# PR reference, never for an exact flag string: every flag in the table above is
# combinable, so `= "--report"` left `--external-review`, `--critical`, `--no-ci`, and
# `--interval S` with no PR to act on.
case "$ARGUMENTS" in
  *github.com/*/pull/*|*\#[0-9]*) ;;                       # a PR was named; use it
  *) CURRENT_PR=$(gh pr view --json url -q .url 2>/dev/null) ;;
esac

review-changes passes no --no-ci — unlike create-pr and autonomous-workflow Phase 7, it owns no CI phase of its own, so the loop's CI sub-step is exactly what keeps a standalone run from converging on a red build instead of a green-threads-red-build one. Forward --no-ci, --external-review, and --interval through when the user passes them.

It converges on not red, not on green. review-loop's ci_is_settled() treats pending as settled — the loop reads check state, never waits for it — so a run can converge with checks still in flight. Wait for the checks yourself before merging, or give CI to a caller that owns a watch (create-pr Step 9, phase-7-ci-gate.md) and pass --no-ci here.

# Default — convergence loop on own or specified PR
Skill("review-loop", "<pr-url-or-number> [--critical|--no-ci|--external-review|--interval S if passed]")

# Report-only (no apply) — one-shot review.
# pr-reviewer is an AGENT — dispatch via the Task tool, NOT Skill():
Task(subagent_type="pr-reviewer", prompt="<pr-url-or-number> [--critical if passed]")

Read the full file on GitHub · 94 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 94 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 70f4be55381a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-changes is a skill published in the GitHub repository mthines/agent-skills (12 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 1,428 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

ego-browser

Skill "ego-browser" from citrolabs/ego-lite, covering ego-browser, quick start, common helpers, task spaces and control handoff.

citrolabs/ego-lite · 210 tokens

temporal-developer

Develop, debug, and manage Temporal applications across Python, TypeScript, Go, Java, .NET, Ruby, and Rust. Use when the user is building workflows, activities, or workers with a Temporal SDK, debugging issues like non-determinism errors, stuck workflows, or activity retries, using Temporal CLI, Temporal Server, or…

temporalio/skill-temporal-developer · 161 tokens

x-algorithm

Write X (Twitter) posts that the For You algorithm actually rewards. Grounded in the open-sourced X recommendation system — the Grok-based transformer ranker, Phoenix retrieval, Thunder in-network store, and Grox content-understanding pipeline. Use when the user wants to write a post, thread, reply, or quote; plan a…

carson2222/skills · 152 tokens

opencode-memory

Browse local OpenCode history: sessions, messages, plans, prompt history, and prior decisions. Use when the user says history, previous session, last time, remember, recall, plans, prior work, or when resuming/debugging repeated work where earlier OpenCode context may help. Do not use for fresh tasks or when current…

carson2222/skills · 77 tokens

creating-explainers

Use when creating an interactive explainer - a single self-contained HTML page with hand-built Canvas figures. Handles source-file explainers, topic-driven research explainers, and mixed intake where files provide the spine and research adds support. Trigger phrases include "make an explainer", "turn this paper into…

analyticalmonk/explain-this · 98 tokens

custom-icons

Create or refine custom icon assets as native or traced SVGs and transparent PNG/WebP files. Use when the user asks for a bespoke icon or cohesive icon set, wants an image traced into a clean vector, or needs a detailed or 3D icon with transparency.

JKc66/custom-icons-skill · 57 tokens