Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mtnyilmaz/agents. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mtnyilmaz/agents/main/.agents/skills/sast-jwt/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mtnyilmaz/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mtnyilmaz/agents/sast-jwt)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mtnyilmaz/agents/sast-jwt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mtnyilmaz/agents/sast-jwt.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00123 | $0.05862 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.02931 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.01172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00586 |
Grade A, and why
sast-jwt scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
> [Proof-of-concept using jwt_tool, hashcat, or curl. This is a copy
100% identical to sast-jwt — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 488 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
JWT Vulnerability Detection
You are performing a focused security assessment to find insecure JSON Web Token (JWT) implementations. This skill uses a two-phase approach with subagents: recon (map the full JWT lifecycle — issuance, verification, and configuration) then analysis (identify every exploitable weakness in those verification sites).
Prerequisites: sast/architecture.md must exist. Run the analysis skill first if it doesn't.
What is an Insecure JWT Implementation
JWTs consist of three Base64URL-encoded parts: header.payload.signature. The header declares the signing algorithm (alg), the payload carries claims (e.g., sub, role, exp), and the signature is a cryptographic proof of integrity. Vulnerabilities arise when the server trusts the token's own claims about how it was signed, fails to verify the signature at all, uses a guessable secret, or trusts attacker-controlled key material embedded in the token itself.
The core pattern: the server does not fully verify the JWT's authenticity and integrity before trusting its claims.
What JWT Vulnerabilities ARE
1. Algorithm confusion — alg: none
The server accepts a JWT whose header declares "alg": "none", bypassing signature verification entirely. An attacker crafts an arbitrary payload, sets alg to none, and omits the signature. If the library processes it, the forged token is accepted.
2. Algorithm confusion — RS256 → HS256 A server configured for RS256 (asymmetric: sign with private key, verify with public key) can be tricked into HS256 mode if the library allows the algorithm to be specified by the token. Since the public key is often retrievable, the attacker signs a forged token with HS256 using the server's public key as the HMAC secret. The server verifies the HMAC using the same public key and accepts the token.
3. Missing or disabled signature verification The server decodes the JWT payload without actually verifying the signature. Common patterns:
- Python (PyJWT):
jwt.decode(token, options={"verify_signature": False}) - Node.js (jsonwebtoken):
jwt.decode(token)instead ofjwt.verify(token, secret) - Manual base64 decode of the payload with no signature check
algorithms=["none"]accepted in the decode call
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 488 lines · 123 tokens per session scan A be3c5b270331
sast-jwt is a skill published in the GitHub repository mtnyilmaz/agents (6 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 123 tokens to every session and 5,862 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 100% identical to sast-jwt, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…