Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/mturac/everything-openai-codex/golang-testingnpx skills add mturac/everything-openai-codex --skill golang-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mturac/everything-openai-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mturac/everything-openai-codex/golang-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mturac/everything-openai-codex/golang-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mturac/everything-openai-codex/golang-testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01657 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00829 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00331 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
golang-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to golang-testing — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 333 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Testing
This skill provides comprehensive Go testing patterns extending common testing principles with Go-specific idioms.
Testing Framework
Use the standard go test with table-driven tests as the primary pattern.
Table-Driven Tests
The idiomatic Go testing pattern:
func TestValidateEmail(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
email string
wantErr bool
}{
{
name: "valid email",
email: "[email protected]",
wantErr: false,
},
{
name: "missing @",
email: "userexample.com",
wantErr: true,
},
{
name: "empty string",
email: "",
wantErr: true,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
err := ValidateEmail(tt.email)
if (err != nil) != tt.wantErr {
t.Errorf("ValidateEmail(%q) error = %v, wantErr %v",
tt.email, err, tt.wantErr)
}
})
}
}
Benefits:
- Easy to add new test cases
- Clear test case documentation
- Parallel test execution with
t.Parallel() - Isolated subtests with
t.Run()
Test Helpers
Use t.Helper() to mark helper functions:
func assertNoError(t *testing.T, err error) {
t.Helper()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
}
}
func assertEqual(t *testing.T, got, want interface{}) {
t.Helper()
if !reflect.DeepEqual(got, want) {
t.Errorf("got %v, want %v", got, want)
}
}
Benefits:
- Correct line numbers in test failures
- Reusable test utilities
- Cleaner test code
Test Fixtures
Use t.Cleanup() for resource cleanup:
func testDB(t *testing.T) *sql.DB {
t.Helper()
db, err := sql.Open("sqlite3", ":memory:")
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("failed to open test db: %v", err)
}
// Cleanup runs after test completes
t.Cleanup(func() {
if err := db.Close(); err != nil {
t.Errorf("failed to close db: %v", err)
}
})
return db
}
func TestUserRepository(t *testing.T) {
db := testDB(t)
repo := NewUserRepository(db)
// ... test logic
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 333 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 9eccdcba69d7
golang-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository mturac/everything-openai-codex (89 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,657 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to golang-testing, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
golang-testing
Go testing best practices including table-driven tests, test helpers, benchmarking, race detection, coverage analysis, and integration testing patterns. Use when writing or improving Go tests.
gen-test
Generate idiomatic tests for Go packages and handlers in the Meshery project.
golang-testing
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI…
setup
Wire Ginkgo into a Go package — install the ginkgo CLI and Ginkgo+Gomega, ginkgo bootstrap to generate the suitetest.go (TestXxx/RegisterFailHandler(Fail)/RunSpecs), the package xxxtest convention, dot-import alternatives (aliased import, dsl/ subpackages, --nodot), ginkgo generate, and testing.T interop via…
golang-stretchr-testify
Comprehensive guide to stretchr/testify for Golang testing. Covers assert, require, mock, and suite packages in depth. Use when writing tests with testify, creating mocks, setting up test suites, or choosing between assert and require. Covers testify assertions, mock expectations, argument matchers, call verification…
eng-test-conventions
Go test-shape discipline for Compozy. Use when writing or editing test.go under cmd or internal after test placement is justified. Do not use for non-Go tests, fixture-only changes, or as a replacement for eng-consolidate-test-suites.