Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mudrii/openclaw-dashboard. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mudrii/openclaw-dashboard/main/.codex/skills/go-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mudrii/openclaw-dashboardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mudrii/openclaw-dashboard/go-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mudrii/openclaw-dashboard/go-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mudrii/openclaw-dashboard/go-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mudrii/openclaw-dashboard/go-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mudrii/openclaw-dashboard/go-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00278 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00139 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
go-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Go Review
This is the native Codex review skill for Go work in this repository.
Use it when:
- the user asks for a review
- the task is to validate a Go change
- the task is to assess risks before or after a refactor
Review Priorities
Report findings first. Prioritize:
- correctness bugs
- behavioral regressions
- API and JSON compatibility changes
- missing or weak tests
- concurrency and shutdown risks
- dependency policy violations
- facade leakage from root package into domain logic
Repository-Specific Checks
- Root package wrappers must stay zero-logic.
- New behavior belongs in
internal/app<domain>/. - Do not assume third-party helpers are acceptable in this zero-dependency repo.
- Treat
json:",omitempty"andjson:",omitzero"changes as API behavior changes. - Check that goroutines have shutdown and ownership semantics.
Review Output
- Lead with concrete findings.
- Use file references.
- Keep summaries brief.
- If there are no findings, say that explicitly and mention residual risk or testing gaps.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 41 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 1612a492a1cc
go-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository mudrii/openclaw-dashboard (455 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 278 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Verification & Quality Assurance
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
langsmith-observability
LLM observability platform for tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications, evaluating model outputs against datasets, monitoring production systems, or building systematic testing pipelines for AI applications.
code-review
Perform a structured code review of changes, checking for correctness, style, tests, and potential issues.
credit-note-fixer
Fix the tiny credit-note formatting bug and rerun the exact targeted test command.
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.
test-corpus
The testdocuments submodule is a bucket-fetched fixture corpus that is not committed. This skill covers readtestfixture, missing fixtures, valid A/B controls, and submodule push order. Load before running Rust tests on a fresh clone, setting up an A/B control, adding a fixture-backed test, or diagnosing…