Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mudrii/openclaw-dashboard. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mudrii/openclaw-dashboard/main/.codex/skills/project-ops/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mudrii/openclaw-dashboardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mudrii/openclaw-dashboard/project-ops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mudrii/openclaw-dashboard/project-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mudrii/openclaw-dashboard/project-ops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mudrii/openclaw-dashboard/project-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mudrii/openclaw-dashboard/project-ops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00316 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00126 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00063 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
project-ops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Project Ops
This is the native Codex operations skill for this repository.
Use it when:
- changing build, test, lint, or check workflows
- editing
Makefileor CI workflows - reviewing release and packaging behavior
- validating commands agents should run in this repo
Source Of Truth
go.moddefines the Go toolchain level.Makefiledefines the preferred local command surface..github/workflows/defines CI expectations.- If these disagree with prose docs, follow code and workflow config first.
Repository Expectations
- Prefer
make build,make test,make lint,make check. - Keep local and CI command surfaces aligned.
- Do not invent commands that the repo does not expose.
- Preserve the zero-dependency bias unless a change explicitly requires otherwise.
- Treat release workflow changes as operational changes that need careful compatibility review.
Change Discipline
- Keep command names stable when possible.
- If command behavior changes, update docs in the same change.
- Prefer small operational changes with obvious rollback paths.
- Do not weaken checks casually to make a change pass.
Review Focus
- command drift between docs, Makefile, and CI
- hidden dependency additions
- missing vet/lint/test coverage in local or CI paths
- release workflow mismatches
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 71035adb119f
project-ops is a skill published in the GitHub repository mudrii/openclaw-dashboard (458 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 316 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa-team
Multi-agent QA review team for code changes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "review my code", "run QA", "qa-team", "review this branch", "code review", "check my changes", or wants a comprehensive multi-perspective code review of the current branch's changes. Spawns parallel specialist agents…
pr-description-generator
Generates comprehensive, structured PR descriptions from git diff or branch comparison. Includes summary, changelog, testing notes, and deployment considerations.
tmcp-pr-risk-review
Use TMCP for PR risk reviews, changed-surface maps, merge readiness, regression risk, missing tests, and review handoff packets.
compiler-commit
Use when you want to verify compiler changes and commit with the correct convention. Runs tests, lint, and format, then commits with the [compiler] or [rust-compiler] prefix.
mem0-test-integration
Verify a Mem0 integration produced by /mem0-integrate. Runs in the same workspace on the same branch (loose coupling) — installs dependencies, runs the repo's native test suite, then exercises a real end-to-end smoke flow against the user's API key. Produces a scorecard. TRIGGER when: user has just run /mem0-integrate…
mem0-integrate
Integrate Mem0 into an existing repository using a goal-driven, TDD pipeline. Detects the repo's language automatically and asks the user to pick between Mem0 Platform (managed) and Mem0 Open Source (self-hosted). Writes failing tests before any implementation. Produces a local feature branch plus .mem0-integration/…