Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MuhammedZohaib/patchman --skill business-logic-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MuhammedZohaib/patchmanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammedzohaib/patchman/business-logic-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammedzohaib/patchman/business-logic-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muhammedzohaib/patchman/business-logic-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammedzohaib/patchman/business-logic-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muhammedzohaib/patchman/business-logic-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00167 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00084 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00033 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
business-logic-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Business Logic Review
Focus
- state machine gaps
- approval or refund bypasses
- replay and duplicate processing
- quota and entitlement circumvention
- race conditions around credits, inventory, or invitations
- UI-only controls missing server-side enforcement
Method
- Identify the invariant the product is trying to preserve.
- Trace where the invariant is enforced.
- Look for alternate paths, retries, replays, and admin shortcuts.
- Confirm whether enforcement survives background jobs and webhooks.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 23 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 5c51650915e2
business-logic-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository MuhammedZohaib/patchman (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 167 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
API Security Testing
Comprehensive API security testing based on OWASP API Security Top 10 including broken authentication, injection attacks, rate limiting, BOLA/BFLA vulnerabilities, and automated security scanning with ZAP and custom scripts.
exploiting-broken-function-level-authorization
Tests APIs for Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA) vulnerabilities where regular users can invoke administrative functions or access privileged API endpoints by directly calling them. The tester identifies admin and privileged endpoints, then attempts to access them with regular user credentials by manipulating…
testing-api-authentication-weaknesses
Tests API authentication mechanisms for weaknesses including broken token validation, missing authentication on endpoints, weak password policies, credential stuffing susceptibility, token leakage in URLs or logs, and session management flaws. The tester evaluates JWT implementation, API key handling, OAuth flows, and…
testing-oauth2-implementation-flaws
Tests OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect implementations for security flaws including authorization code interception, redirect URI manipulation, CSRF in OAuth flows, token leakage, scope escalation, and PKCE bypass. The tester evaluates the authorization server, client application, and token handling for common…
testing-websocket-api-security
Tests WebSocket API implementations for security vulnerabilities including missing authentication on WebSocket upgrade, Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH), injection attacks through WebSocket messages, insufficient input validation, denial-of-service via message flooding, and information leakage through WebSocket…
Auth Bypass Tester
Comprehensive authentication and authorization bypass testing including session hijacking, privilege escalation, JWT manipulation, and access control verification.