Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill consent-for-transfersgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mukul975/privacy-data-protection-skills/consent-for-transfers)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mukul975/privacy-data-protection-skills/consent-for-transfers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mukul975/privacy-data-protection-skills/consent-for-transfers/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mukul975/privacy-data-protection-skills/consent-for-transfers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mukul975/privacy-data-protection-skills/consent-for-transfers.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01428 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00714 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00286 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
consent-for-transfers scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Managing Consent for Transfers
Overview
GDPR Article 49(1)(a) provides that in the absence of an adequacy decision (Article 45) or appropriate safeguards (Article 46), a transfer of personal data to a third country may take place if "the data subject has explicitly consented to the proposed transfer, after having been informed of the possible risks of such transfers for the data subject due to the absence of an adequacy decision and appropriate safeguards."
This is a derogation — a last resort — not a primary transfer mechanism. The EDPB Guidelines 2/2018 on derogations under Article 49 emphasize that derogations must be interpreted restrictively and should not become the rule.
Explicit Consent Requirements for Transfers
What Makes Transfer Consent "Explicit"
Explicit consent under Article 49(1)(a) requires a higher standard than standard consent under Article 6(1)(a):
- Express statement: The data subject must make an express statement of consent specifically for the transfer. An unticked checkbox is sufficient for standard consent but may not be sufficient for explicit consent — a written or typed declaration is preferred.
- Specific to the transfer: Consent must specifically mention the international transfer, not be buried in general terms.
- Informed of risks: The data subject must be told about the specific risks of the transfer, not just generic warnings.
- Specific destination: The third country or countries must be named.
- Absence disclosed: The data subject must be told that there is no adequacy decision and no appropriate safeguards in place for the destination.
Information That Must Be Provided Before Consent
Per Article 49(1)(a) and EDPB Guidelines 2/2018:
| Information Element | Description | Example for CloudVault SaaS Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Destination country | Specific country name | India |
| Recipient identity | Who will receive the data | CloudVault India Pvt. Ltd. (subsidiary) |
| Purpose of transfer | Why the data is being transferred | Customer support during EU night hours |
| Data categories | What personal data will be transferred | Name, email, account metadata, support ticket content |
| Absence of adequacy decision | India does not have an EU adequacy decision | "India has not been recognized by the European Commission as providing an adequate level of data protection" |
| Absence of safeguards | No SCCs or BCRs in place for this transfer | "This transfer is not covered by Standard Contractual Clauses or Binding Corporate Rules" |
| Specific risks | What could go wrong | "Indian data protection law (DPDP Act 2023) may not provide equivalent protections. Government access requests may not be subject to the same limitations as under EU law." |
| Withdrawal right | How to withdraw consent | "You can withdraw consent for this transfer at any time in Settings > Privacy" |
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 97 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 9a4134be040d
consent-for-transfers is a skill published in the GitHub repository mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills (272 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,428 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
privacy-compliance
Comprehensive global privacy compliance agent skill covering GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, HIPAA Privacy Rule, EU AI Act, LGPD, cross-border data transfer mechanisms (SCCs, BCRs, EU-US DPF), PII identification and classification, data minimization, consent management, privacy-by-design patterns, DPIA workflows, data subject access…
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
gdpr-compliance
Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and…
iso42001
Expert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI governance, AI management systems, AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment, Annex A controls for AI, Statement of Applicability for AI systems, AI policy, responsible AI, AI…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
nist-800-53
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 compliance advisor — all 20 control families (AC, AT, AU, CA, CM, CP, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, PM, PS, PT, RA, SA, SC, SI, SR), Low/Moderate/High baseline selection, FIPS 199/200 system categorization, control tailoring and overlays, privacy controls (PT family), supply chain risk management (SR…