Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill server-side-trackinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mukul975/privacy-data-protection-skills/server-side-tracking)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mukul975/privacy-data-protection-skills/server-side-tracking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mukul975/privacy-data-protection-skills/server-side-tracking/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mukul975/privacy-data-protection-skills/server-side-tracking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mukul975/privacy-data-protection-skills/server-side-tracking.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.02347 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01174 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00469 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00235 |
Grade A, and why
server-side-tracking scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 229 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Server-Side Tracking with Privacy Controls
Overview
Server-side tracking moves data collection from the user's browser to a server-controlled environment, providing greater control over what data is shared with third parties. Instead of loading third-party JavaScript directly in the browser (which sets third-party cookies and sends data to external servers without intermediation), a server-side container receives events from the client, processes them, and selectively forwards data to analytics and advertising endpoints. This architecture enables IP anonymization before data leaves the first-party infrastructure, consent-based routing of events, and reduced reliance on third-party cookies — directly supporting ePrivacy Directive Article 5(3) compliance and data minimization under GDPR Article 5(1)(c).
Architecture
Client-Server Flow
User's Browser
│
├── Client-side GTM container (minimal)
│ └── Sends events to first-party endpoint
│
▼
First-Party Server Endpoint
(https://data.pinnacle-ecommerce.com)
│
├── Server-side GTM container
│ ├── Validates consent state
│ ├── Anonymizes IP address
│ ├── Strips unnecessary identifiers
│ ├── Applies data minimization rules
│ │
│ ├── [If analytics consent granted]
│ │ └── Forward to Google Analytics 4
│ │
│ ├── [If advertising consent granted]
│ │ ├── Forward to Google Ads
│ │ ├── Forward to Meta Conversions API
│ │ └── Forward to other ad platforms
│ │
│ └── [If all consent denied]
│ └── Log aggregate pageview count only (no PII)
│
└── First-party server logs (retention: 90 days)
Infrastructure Setup for Pinnacle E-Commerce Ltd
Server Container Hosting Options:
| Option | Provider | Monthly Cost (est.) | Latency | Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Cloud Run | Google Cloud | EUR 50-200 | Low | High |
| AWS App Runner | Amazon Web Services | EUR 40-180 | Low | High |
| Custom Docker | Self-hosted | EUR 30-150 | Varies | Maximum |
| Stape.io | Managed service | EUR 20-100 | Low | Medium |
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 229 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 137a0e38e947
server-side-tracking is a skill published in the GitHub repository mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills (271 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 2,347 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
privacy-compliance
Comprehensive global privacy compliance agent skill covering GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, HIPAA Privacy Rule, EU AI Act, LGPD, cross-border data transfer mechanisms (SCCs, BCRs, EU-US DPF), PII identification and classification, data minimization, consent management, privacy-by-design patterns, DPIA workflows, data subject access…
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
gdpr-compliance
Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and…
iso42001
Expert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI governance, AI management systems, AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment, Annex A controls for AI, Statement of Applicability for AI systems, AI policy, responsible AI, AI…
nist-800-53
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 compliance advisor — all 20 control families (AC, AT, AU, CA, CM, CP, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, PM, PS, PT, RA, SA, SC, SI, SR), Low/Moderate/High baseline selection, FIPS 199/200 system categorization, control tailoring and overlays, privacy controls (PT family), supply chain risk management (SR…