requesting-change-review

requesting-change-review is a skill for Claude Code from muloka/claude-plugins. It costs 39 tokens per session (1,397 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A review step for sending a jj change to generalist reviewers. jj is a version-control tool for managing changes to code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Requesting review of a jj change after finishing work, before committing, or while reviewing an existing change.
Why use it?
It provides a review checkpoint before changes are committed or after work is completed.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the peer-review-jj plugin — 2 skills, 1 command, 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Requesting review of a jj change after finishing work, before committing, or while reviewing an existing change.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/muloka/claude-plugins/requesting-change-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add muloka/claude-plugins --skill requesting-change-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/muloka/claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install peer-review-jj, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 skills, 1 command, 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for requesting-change-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muloka/claude-plugins/requesting-change-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/muloka/claude-plugins/requesting-change-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muloka/claude-plugins/requesting-change-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muloka/claude-plugins/requesting-change-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 39 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,397 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00039 $0.01397
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00698
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00279
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00140

Measured 8d ago against content hash ec5285a2e953, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

requesting-change-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/peer-review-jj/skills/requesting-change-review/SKILL.md · 151 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 151 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A ec5285a2e953

Subscribe to this mod's changes

requesting-change-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository muloka/claude-plugins (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,397 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

lightjj

Interacts with a running lightjj instance (browser-based Jujutsu/jj viewer) via the lightjj api CLI. Reads diffs, posts inline review comments, posts doc-mode suggestions, and steers the user's view. Use when the user has lightjj running and wants the agent to review changes, annotate diffs, or comment on markdown…

chronologos/lightjj · 77 tokens

intended-vs-implemented

The method for finding the gap between what a system is supposed to do and what the code actually does — the class of bug generic scanners miss because they have no model of intent. Defines what counts as documented intent, what counts as implementation evidence, which mismatches matter, and how to avoid hand-wavy…

phuryn/pm-skills · 95 tokens

craft-goal

Compile or lint a persistent Mayor-style goal prompt that ratchets a bead graph through bounded RPI experiments toward one larger outcome. Triggers: "craft a goal prompt", "mayor goal", "goal-runner prompt", "lint this goal", "is this goal safe". (Shaping one experiment's intent routes to plan.).

boshu2/agentops · 71 tokens

council

Gather independent views on a high-stakes judgment. Not for one-judge plan challenge; that is premortem. Triggers: "council", "multi-judge review", "independent perspectives".

boshu2/agentops · 47 tokens

plan

Shape or refine the existing bead or caller intent without a second planning artifact. Triggers: "plan", "discover and plan", "shape this goal", "review write scope", "check scope boundaries", "scope this change".

boshu2/agentops · 48 tokens

code-review

Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Use for receiving feedback, requesting code-reviewer subagent reviews, or preventing false completion claims in pull requests.

secondsky/claude-skills · 35 tokens